Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 1;21(1):171.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02442-7.

Use of strips of rapid diagnostic tests as a source of ribonucleic acid for genomic surveillance of viruses: an example of SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations

Use of strips of rapid diagnostic tests as a source of ribonucleic acid for genomic surveillance of viruses: an example of SARS-CoV-2

Alpha Kabiné Keita et al. Virol J. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to demonstrate that the genomic material of SARS-CoV-2 can be isolated from strips of COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test cassettes.

Method: It was a prospective cross-sectional study involving patients admitted to treatment centers and sampling sites in the city of Conakry, Guinea. A total of 121 patients were double sampled, and 9 more patients were tested only for RDT. PCR was conducted according to the protocol of the RunMei kit. Sequencing was performed by using the illumina COVIDSeq protocol. Nine COVID-19 RDTs without nasopharyngeal swabs were in addition tested.

Result: Among the 130 COVID-19 RDTs, forty-seven were macroscopically positive, whereas seventy-two were positive according to PCR using RDT strip, while among the 121 VTM swabs, sixty-four were positive. Among eighty-three negative COVID-19 RDTs, twenty-seven were positive by PCR using RDT strip with a geometric mean Ct value of 32.49 cycles. Compared to those of PCR using VTM, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR using RDT strip were estimated to be 100% and 85.96%, respectively, with 93.39% test accuracy. Among the fifteen COVID-19 RDT extracts eligible for sequencing, eleven had sequences identical to those obtained via the standard method, with coverage between 75 and 99.6%.

Conclusion: These results show that COVID-19 RDTs can be used as biological material for the genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: COVID-19 RDT; Genomic surveillance; Molecular diagnostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Implementation of the viral RNA extraction protocol from the rapid diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2. (1) Quality of the PCR curves made from the sample placement area. The CT values were: Gene N = 24.19; Gene ORF1ab = 30.29 and Internal Control (C. Int) Cy5 = 29.64. (2) Quality of the PCR curves made from the reading area of the RDT, with CT values of: Gene N = 28.12; ORF1ab gene = 32.24 and C. Int Cy5 = 32.53. (3) Quality of the PCR curves made from the distal end of the RDT, with CT values of: Gene N = 30.45; ORF1ab gene = 33.34 and C. Int Cy5 = 34.55. (4) Positive control curves. N gene = 19.09; ORF1ab gene = 21.49 and C. Int Cy5 = 22.25. This result indicates that the sample placement zone curves closely resemble those of the positive control
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The sample distribution flowchart for PCR conducted using COVID-19 RDT extract is called PCR using RDT strip and PCR conducted with nasopharyngeal samples contained in a viral transport medium is called PCR using VTM (PCR). The macroscopic results of the COVID-19 antigen RDT are simply called the RDT
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ct value distribution for PCRVTM and PCRStrip. a Designates the distribution of forty-six (46) samples positive for the COVID-19 RDT, PCR using VTM (PCRVTM) and PCR DRT strip (PCRStrip). b Represents the distribution of sixty-four PCRStrip and PCRVTM positive samples. c Designates the distribution of Ct values of eighteen samples positive for PCRVTM and PCRStrip and negative for the COVID-19 RDT. d Represent the eight samples negative for PCRStrip and RDT COVID-19 tests

References

    1. Sharma K, Aggarwala P, Gandhi D, Mathias A, Singh P, Sharma S, et al. Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: quest for the best choice. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0249408. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249408. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249408 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. COVID-19 cases|WHO COVID-19 dashboard [Internet]. 2024 [Cited 2024 Jan 31]. https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c.
    1. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Laboratory guidelines for the detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 virus infection [Internet]. 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technica....
    1. CDC. Interim guidelines for clinical specimens for COVID-19|CDC [Internet]. [Cited 2023 Jul 18]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim....
    1. Machhi J, Herskovitz J, Senan AM, Dutta D, Nath B, Oleynikov MD, et al. The natural history, pathobiology, and clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infections. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2020;15:359–86. 10.1007/s11481-020-09944-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources