Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 1;7(3):ooae064.
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae064. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Effect of a behavioral nudge on adoption of an electronic health record-agnostic pulmonary embolism risk prediction tool: a pilot cluster nonrandomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Effect of a behavioral nudge on adoption of an electronic health record-agnostic pulmonary embolism risk prediction tool: a pilot cluster nonrandomized controlled trial

Safiya Richardson et al. JAMIA Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a behavioral nudge on adoption of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool.

Materials and methods: We conducted a pilot cluster nonrandomized controlled trial in 2 Emergency Departments (EDs) at a large academic healthcare system in the New York metropolitan area. We tested 2 versions of a CDS tool for pulmonary embolism (PE) risk assessment developed on a web-based electronic health record-agnostic platform. One version included behavioral nudges incorporated into the user interface.

Results: A total of 1527 patient encounters were included in the trial. The CDS tool adoption rate was 31.67%. Adoption was significantly higher for the tool that included behavioral nudges (39.11% vs 20.66%; P < .001).

Discussion: We demonstrated feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a PE risk prediction CDS tool developed using insights from behavioral science. The tool is well-positioned to be tested in a large randomized clinical trial.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05203185).

Keywords: behavioral economics; clinical decision support; computed tomography; pulmonary angiogram; pulmonary embolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pulmonary embolism risk prediction clinical decision support tool.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pulmonary embolism risk prediction clinical decision support tool with behavioral nudge.

References

    1. Mitchell AM, Jones AE, Tumlin JA, Kline JA.. Prospective study of the incidence of contrast‐induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast‐enhanced computed tomography. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(6):618-625. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niemann T, Zbinden I, Roser H, Bremerich J, Remy-Jardin M, Bongartz G.. Computed tomography for pulmonary embolism: assessment of a 1-year cohort and estimated cancer risk associated with diagnostic irradiation. Acta Radiol. 2013;54(7):778-784. - PubMed
    1. Little MP, Azizova TV, Richardson DB, et al.Ionising radiation and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2023;380:e072924. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qaseem A, Snow V, Barry P, Joint American Academy of Family Physicians/American College of Physicians Panel on Deep Venous Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism, et al.Current diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in primary care: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Internal Med. 2007;146(6):454-458. - PubMed
    1. Wang RC, Bent S, Weber E, Neilson J, Smith-Bindman R, Fahimi J.. The impact of clinical decision rules on computed tomography use and yield for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(6):693.e3-701.e3. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources