Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 18:12:1264019.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1264019. eCollection 2024.

Influence parental- and child-related factors on the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 test methods in schools and daycare facilities

Affiliations

Influence parental- and child-related factors on the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 test methods in schools and daycare facilities

Johanna K Loy et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was an essential step in reducing the spread of the virus and monitoring pandemic development. Most mandatory standard pandemic testing in Germany has been performed in schools and daycare facilities. We investigated the influence of behavioral and attitudinal characteristics of children and caregivers on their acceptance of (i) antigen-based nasal swab rapid and (ii) oral saliva-based pooled Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests.

Methods: Conducted through a cross-sectional survey between November and December 2021, with 1962 caregivers and 581 children/adolescents participating, the study evaluated the acceptability of each testing method on a six-point scale. Participants scored one test method conducted on their child at one of six levels with 1 and 6 denoting "excellent" (1) and "inadequate" (6), respectively. We considered demographic variables, vaccination status, child mental health (measured by the SDQ-questionnaire), and facility type (kindergarten, primary school, secondary school) as covariates.

Results: Results reveal a preference for saliva-based PCR tests over nasal swabs by about one grade, particularly among parents of unvaccinated children, especially if their child expressed future vaccination reluctance. Testing acceptance was lower among children with mental health issues, primary school-aged, and those with less-educated parents. Perception of test accuracy and convenience influenced attitudes, favoring saliva-based PCR tests. Moreover, children with mental health issues felt less secure during testing.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the influence of different testing methods on testing acceptance for SARS-CoV-2 in children and caregivers. Our study identifies predictors of lower acceptance of public health surveillance measures and enables the development of educational programs on testing and vaccination tailored to the needs of specific target groups. Moreover, we demonstrate that test acceptance in vulnerable groups can be enhanced by careful choice of an appropriate testing method.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; acceptance; school; surveillance; test method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
School grades (1—very good, 2—good, 3—satisfactory, 4—sufficient, 5—insufficient, 6—poor) for COVID-19 testing according to the child care setting and the children/adolescents’ age (kindergarten: 4–6 years, primary school: 6–10 years, secondary school: 10–17 years).
Figure 2
Figure 2
School grades for COVID-19 tests according to test method, children’s gender and vaccination status/parents report on their children’s’ willingness to be vaccinated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh S, Roy D, Sinha K, Parveen S, Sharma G, Joshi G. Impact of Covid-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: a narrative review with recommendations. Psychiatry Res. (2020) 293:113429. doi: 10.1016/J.Psychres.2020.113429, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stavridou A, Stergiopoulou A-A, Panagouli E, Mesiris G, Thirios A, Mougiakos T, et al. . Psychosocial consequences of Covid-19 in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2020) 74:615–6. doi: 10.1111/Pcn.13134, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sachs JD, Karim SS, Aknin L, Allen J, Brosbøl K, Colombo F, et al. . The lancet commission on lessons for the future from the Covid-19 pandemic. Lancet. (2022) 400:1224–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mossong J, Hens N, Jit M, Beutels P, Auranen K, Mikolajczyk R, et al. . Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. (2008) 5:E74. doi: 10.1371/Journal.Pmed.0050074, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unesco Institute For Statistics . Total duration of school closures. (2022). Available at: https://En.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse#durationschoolclosures.

LinkOut - more resources