Food environment in Burkina Faso: priority actions recommended to the government using Food-EPI tool
- PMID: 39091684
- PMCID: PMC11293057
- DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1420323
Food environment in Burkina Faso: priority actions recommended to the government using Food-EPI tool
Abstract
Introduction: The food environment is an important factor in the efforts of countries worldwide to achieve a transition to sustainable food systems. The objective of this study is to formulate and prioritize actions to be addressed to the government of Burkina Faso for the creation of a healthy food environment, which will contribute to reducing malnutrition in all its forms and non-communicable diseases.
Methods: National experts were brought together to identify and prioritize actions to fill the gaps identified through a multi-step assessment process following the methodology of the Healthy Food and Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).
Results: Up to 20 priority policy actions were recommended to the Burkina Faso government. Actions in the policy component focused mainly on regulation of food promotion and marketing, particularly to children, and others in the infrastructure support component focused largely on political leadership, i.e., strong and visible political support from the government to improve the food environment, population nutrition, diet-related non-communicable diseases and their inequalities.
Conclusion: The priority actions to be recommended to the government will strengthen advocacy for government decisions to create a healthier food environment in the country.
Keywords: Burkina Faso; Food-EPI; food environment; food system; government actions; public policies.
Copyright © 2024 Tapsoba, Compaore, Zeba, Some, Manga, Diouf, Moubarac, Vandevijvere and Dicko.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. (2016) 388:1659–724. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
