Bridging the Gap: A narrative review of osteoporosis disability, adipokines, and the role of AI in postmenopausal women
- PMID: 39092029
- PMCID: PMC11255809
- DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.7.9072
Bridging the Gap: A narrative review of osteoporosis disability, adipokines, and the role of AI in postmenopausal women
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a global health concern characterized by reduced bone density and compromised bone quality, resulting in an increased risk of fractures, particularly in postmenopausal women. The assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) plays a pivotal role in diagnosing osteoporosis, as it accounts for approximately 70% of overall bone strength. The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed BMD measurement as a reliable method for diagnosing this condition. In Pakistan, the incidence of bone fractures is on the rise, largely attributable to an aging population and a range of contributing factors. Understanding the global and local prevalence of osteoporosis, its impact on morbidity and mortality, and the contributing factors is vital for developing effective preventive and therapeutic strategies. The role of adipokines, including chemerin, vaspin, and omentin-1, in bone metabolism is an emerging area of investigation. These adipokines play diverse roles in physiology, ranging from inflammation and metabolic regulation to cardiovascular health. Understanding their potential impact on bone health is a topic of ongoing research. The intricate relationship between bone density, bone quality, and overall bone strength is central to understanding the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Current innovation in machine learning and predictive model can bring revolution in the field of bone health and osteoporosis. Early identification of people with osteoporosis or risk of fracture through machine learning can prevent disability and improve the quality of life.
Keywords: Adipokines; Artificial intelligence; BMD; Osteoporosis.
Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: None.
References
-
- Davidson S, Vecellio A, Flagstad I, Holton K, Bruzina A, Lender P, et al. Discrepancy between DXA and CT-based assessment of spine bone mineral density. Spine Deform. 2023:677–683. doi:10.1007/s43390-023-00646-5. - PubMed
-
- Bleibler F, Konnopka A, Benzinger P, Rapp K, König HH. The health burden and costs of incident fractures attributable to osteoporosis from 2010 to 2050 in Germany—a demographic simulation model. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:835–847. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2020-z. - PubMed
-
- Wright NC, Saag KG, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris ES. The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28:1225–1232. doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3865-3. - PubMed
-
- Michael Lewiecki E, Wright NC, Curtis JR, Siris E, Gagel RF, Saag KG, et al. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(3):717–722. doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0. - PubMed
-
- Wong BL, Chan YH, O'Neill GK, Murphy D, Merchant RA. Frailty, length of stay and cost in hip fracture patients. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(1):59–68. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06553-1. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous