Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Dec;35(12):2107-2116.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07208-z. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Real-world efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) compared with reference teriparatide on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, and bone parameters assessed using quantitative ultrasound, 3D-SHAPER® and high-resolution peripheral computer tomography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and very high fracture risk

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Real-world efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) compared with reference teriparatide on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, and bone parameters assessed using quantitative ultrasound, 3D-SHAPER® and high-resolution peripheral computer tomography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and very high fracture risk

Peyman Hadji et al. Osteoporos Int. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

A retrospective analysis comparing a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) with reference teriparatide for osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women at high fracture risk found them to be therapeutically equivalent. Both provided significant improvements in lumber spine BMD, TBS, and other parameters of bone health, assessed using multiple diagnostic methods.

Purpose: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) with reference teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at very high fracture risk.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 25 postmenopausal female patients treated for osteoporosis with RGB-10 for 24 months and a matched cohort of 25 patients treated with reference teriparatide. The following outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 months: bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and integral, trabecular and cortical volumetric and surface BMD using 3D-SHAPER® imaging, trabecular bone score (TBS), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) imaging of the radius and tibia.

Results: No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in any of the measured parameters of BMD or bone health at baseline as well as in any timepoint when assessed using these various diagnostic methods. Both compounds provided equivalent significant improvements from baseline in measures of osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Conclusion: The results of the analysis demonstrate the therapeutic equivalence of the teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) to reference teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture.

Keywords: BMD; Biosimilar; Fracture; HRpQCT; Osteoporosis; Teriparatide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki as well as with local ethical requirements. All study subjects gave written consent to participate. Conflicts of interest: P. Hadji: Has received study, educational and travel support from Amgen, Elli Lilly, Gedeon Richter, STADA Arzneimittel AG, Theramex and UCB. L. Kamali: No conflicts of interest relevant to this work. F. Thomasius: Has received honoraria for consulting or lectures from Amgen, Fresenius, Gedeon-Richter, STADA Arzneimittel AG, Theramex and UCB. K. Horas: No conflicts of interest relevant to this work. A. Kurth: Has received fees as a scientific advisor for Amgen, Theramex, Merit Medical, AgNovos, UCB, Image Biopsie Lab and as a lecturer for Amgen, STADA Arzneimittel AG, UCB, Alexion, AgNovos, Hologic. N. Bock: No conflicts of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change from baseline in bone mineral density assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 12 and 24 months following treatment with reference teriparatide (orange) or teriparatide biosimilar (blue). Figures show BMD (a) at the lumbar spine, (b) femoral neck and (c) total hip. ** = p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus baseline; NS, not significant versus baseline. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) assessed using 3D-SHAPER® imaging at 12 and 24 months following treatment with reference teriparatide (orange) or teriparatide biosimilar (blue). Figures show (a) trabecular volumetric BMD, (b) cortical thickness, (c) cortical volumetric BMD (d) cortical surface BMD, (e) integral volumetric BMD. ** = p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus baseline; NS, not significant versus baseline. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change from baseline in (a) trabecular bone scores and (b) qualitative ultrasound measurements at 12 and 24 months following treatment with reference teriparatide (orange) or teriparatide biosimilar (blue). ** = p < 0.01, * = p < 0.05 versus baseline; NS, not significant versus baseline. Values are median ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change from baseline in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) structure and density parameters for the radius after (a) 12 and (b) 24 months of treatment and for the tibia after (c) 12 and (d) 24 months of treatment with reference teriparatide (orange) or teriparatide biosimilar (blue). * = p < 0.05 versus baseline. Values are median ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change from baseline in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) structure and density parameters for the radius after (a) 12 and (b) 24 months of treatment and for the tibia after (c) 12 and (d) 24 months of treatment with reference teriparatide (orange) or teriparatide biosimilar (blue). * = p < 0.05 versus baseline. Values are median ± standard error of the mean (SEM)

References

    1. Tu KN, Lie JD, Wan CKV, Cameron M, Austel AG, Nguyen JK, Van K, Hyun D (2018) Osteoporosis: A Review of Treatment Options. P T 43:92–104 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Handel MN, Cardoso I, von Bulow C et al (2023) Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 381:e068033 - PMC - PubMed
    1. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Siris ES (2022) The clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 33:2049–2102 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hadji P, Esterberg E, Obermuller D, Bartsch R (2024) Bone evaluation study-2: update on the epidemiology of osteoporosis in Germany. Arch Osteoporos 19:26 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kostenuik PJ, Binkley N, Anderson PA (2023) Advances in Osteoporosis Therapy: Focus on Osteoanabolic Agents, Secondary Fracture Prevention, and Perioperative Bone Health. Curr Osteoporos Rep 21:386–400 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances