Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;15(9):100281.
doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100281. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

The Carbon Isotope Ratio as an Objective Biomarker of Added Sugar Intake: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence in Human Nutrition

Affiliations

The Carbon Isotope Ratio as an Objective Biomarker of Added Sugar Intake: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence in Human Nutrition

Gina L Tripicchio et al. Adv Nutr. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Objective biomarkers of dietary intake are needed to advance nutrition research. The carbon isotope ratio (C13/C12; CIR) holds promise as an objective biomarker of added sugar (AS) and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. This systematic scoping review presents the current evidence on CIRs from human studies. Search results (through April 12, 2024) yielded 6297 studies and 24 final articles. Studies were observational (n = 12), controlled feeding (n = 10), or dietary interventions (n = 2). CIRs were sampled from blood (n = 23), hair (n = 5), breath (n = 2), and/or adipose tissue (n = 1). Most (n = 17) conducted whole tissue (that is, bulk) analysis, 8 used compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA), and/or 2 studies used methods appropriate for analyzing breath. Studies were conducted in 3 concentrated geographic regions of the United States (n = 7 Virginia; n = 5 Arizona; n = 4 Alaska), with only 2 studies conducted in other countries. Studies that used CSIA to examine the CIR from the amino acid alanine (CIR-Ala; n = 4) and CIR analyzed from breath (n = 2) provided the most robust evidence for CIR as an objective biomarker of AS and SSBs (R2 range 0.36-0.91). Studies using bulk analysis of hair or blood showed positive, but modest and more variable associations with AS and SSBs (R2 range 0.05-0.48). Few studies showed no association, particularly in non-United States populations and those with low AS and SSB intakes. Two studies provided evidence for CIR to detect changes in SSB intake in response to dietary interventions. Overall, the most compelling evidence supports CIR-Ala as an objective indicator of AS intake and breath CIR as an indicator of short-term AS intake. Considering how to adjust for underlying dietary patterns remains an important area of future work and emerging methods using breath and CSIA warrant additional investigation. More evidence is needed to refine the utility and specificity of CIRs to measure AS and SSB intake.

Keywords: added sugar; biomarker; dietary assessment; stable isotopes; sugar-sweetened beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram for the systematically conducted scoping literature review search of databases and registers for studies on the CIR as a biomarker of AS and SSB intake. AS, added sugar; CIR, carbon isotope ratio; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews; SSB; sugar-sweetened beverage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . 2020–2025. Dietary guidelines for Americans. [Internet]. 2020 [cited January 10, 2024]. Available from: DietaryGuidelines.gov.
    1. Subar A.F., Freedman L.S., Tooze J.A., Kirkpatrick S.I., Boushey C., Neuhouser M.L., et al. Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. J. Nutr. 2015;145(12):2639–2645. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.219634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer E. The NHANES dietary data are physiologically implausible and inadmissible as scientific evidence. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;106(3):951–952. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.150946. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer E., Arjmandi B. Falsehoods and facts about dietary sugars: a call for evidence-based policy. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;61(22):3725–3739. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1804320. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Archer E., Marlow M.L., Lavie C.J. Controversy and debate: memory-based methods paper 1: the fatal flaws of food frequency questionnaires and other memory-based dietary assessment methods. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2018;104:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types