Influence of viscosity and fiber reinforcement of resin composite on fracture strength and failure mode of restored molars
- PMID: 39095320
- DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13293
Influence of viscosity and fiber reinforcement of resin composite on fracture strength and failure mode of restored molars
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the fracture behavior of human molars with extensive MOD restorations using short-fiber-reinforced resin composite of varying viscosities.
Materials and methods: Human molars were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 12): intact teeth (control); restoration using conventional high-viscosity resin composite without (Filtek Z350XT, 3M) or with fibers (everX Posterior, GC); conventional low-viscosity resin composite without (Filtek Supreme Flowable, 3M) or with fibers (everX Flow Dentin Shade, GC); bulk-fill low-viscosity resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow, 3M) or with fibers (everX Flow Bulk Shade, GC). Restorations were performed on extensive MOD preparations, following the manufacturers' recommendations for each material. Specimens underwent fracture strength testing (N) and fracture pattern (%) categorized as repairable, possibly repairable, or non-repairable. Results were analyzed using a generalized linear model (N) and Fisher's exact test (%), with α = 0.05.
Results: Restorations performed with high-viscosity materials showed fracture strength values similar to the control and higher than those of restorations using low-viscosity resin composites (p < 0.0001), except for the bulk-fill low-viscosity resin composite with fibers (p > 0.05). Teeth restored using low-viscosity resin composite with fibers showed a higher % of repairable and possibly repairable fractures than the control (p = 0.0091).
Conclusions: The viscosity of materials mediated the fracture strength, with restorations using high-viscosity resin composites promoting values similar to the intact tooth; however, the presence of fibers influenced the fracture pattern.
Clinical significance: Teeth with MOD cavities restored with high-viscosity resin composites showed similar fracture strength to intact teeth. Fiber-reinforced low-viscosity resin composite for the base of restoration resulted in a more repairable/possibly repairable fracture pattern.
Keywords: composite resins; dental restoration failure; mechanical stress.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Fracture resistance of molars with class II MOD cavities restored with bulk-fill, no-cap flowable bulk-fill, and conventional resin composite restorative systems after 6-months water storage.BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05951-1. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40394542 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of fiber-reinforced direct restorative materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with a conservative endodontic cavity design.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 16;28(6):316. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05720-4. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38750289 Free PMC article.
-
Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2021 Aug 1;34(2):173-182. doi: 10.54589/aol.34/2/173. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2021. PMID: 34570866 Free PMC article.
-
Can Fiber-reinforced Composites Increase the Fracture Resistance of Direct Composite Restorations in Structurally Compromised Teeth? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laboratory Studies.Oper Dent. 2025 Jan 1;50(1):E1-E29. doi: 10.2341/24-032-LIT. Oper Dent. 2025. PMID: 39601683
-
Clinical Outcomes of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations: A 10-Year Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Apr;37(4):920-933. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13339. Epub 2024 Oct 27. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025. PMID: 39462873 Review.
Cited by
-
Fracture Resistance of Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Direct Restorations on Endodontically Treated Molar Teeth with Furcal Perforation.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;17(3):370. doi: 10.3390/polym17030370. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39940571 Free PMC article.
-
Proposal of a Modular Classification System for Direct Dental Resin Composites Based on Clinical Applications.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;17(5):564. doi: 10.3390/polym17050564. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40076058 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Garoushi S, Sungur S, Boz Y, et al. Influence of short‐fiber composite base on fracture behavior of direct and indirect restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(7):4543‐4552. doi:10.1007/s00784‐020‐03768‐6
-
- Magne P, Milani T. Short‐fiber reinforced MOD restorations of molars with severely undermined cusps. J Adhes Dent. 2023;25:99‐106. doi:10.3290/j.jad.b4051477
-
- Bijelic‐Donova J, Keulemans F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Direct bilayered biomimetic composite restoration: The effect of a cusp‐supporting short fiber‐reinforced base design on the chewing fracture resistance and failure mode of molars with or without endodontic treatment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103554. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103554
-
- Atalay C, Yazici AR, Horuztepe A, Nagas E, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk fill, bulk fill Flowable, fiber‐reinforced, and conventional resin composite. Oper Dent. 2016;41(5):E131‐E140. doi:10.2341/15‐320‐L
-
- Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29‐38. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous