Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;36(11):1547-1556.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.13293. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Influence of viscosity and fiber reinforcement of resin composite on fracture strength and failure mode of restored molars

Affiliations

Influence of viscosity and fiber reinforcement of resin composite on fracture strength and failure mode of restored molars

Karin Tyeme Borges et al. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the fracture behavior of human molars with extensive MOD restorations using short-fiber-reinforced resin composite of varying viscosities.

Materials and methods: Human molars were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 12): intact teeth (control); restoration using conventional high-viscosity resin composite without (Filtek Z350XT, 3M) or with fibers (everX Posterior, GC); conventional low-viscosity resin composite without (Filtek Supreme Flowable, 3M) or with fibers (everX Flow Dentin Shade, GC); bulk-fill low-viscosity resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow, 3M) or with fibers (everX Flow Bulk Shade, GC). Restorations were performed on extensive MOD preparations, following the manufacturers' recommendations for each material. Specimens underwent fracture strength testing (N) and fracture pattern (%) categorized as repairable, possibly repairable, or non-repairable. Results were analyzed using a generalized linear model (N) and Fisher's exact test (%), with α = 0.05.

Results: Restorations performed with high-viscosity materials showed fracture strength values similar to the control and higher than those of restorations using low-viscosity resin composites (p < 0.0001), except for the bulk-fill low-viscosity resin composite with fibers (p > 0.05). Teeth restored using low-viscosity resin composite with fibers showed a higher % of repairable and possibly repairable fractures than the control (p = 0.0091).

Conclusions: The viscosity of materials mediated the fracture strength, with restorations using high-viscosity resin composites promoting values similar to the intact tooth; however, the presence of fibers influenced the fracture pattern.

Clinical significance: Teeth with MOD cavities restored with high-viscosity resin composites showed similar fracture strength to intact teeth. Fiber-reinforced low-viscosity resin composite for the base of restoration resulted in a more repairable/possibly repairable fracture pattern.

Keywords: composite resins; dental restoration failure; mechanical stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Garoushi S, Sungur S, Boz Y, et al. Influence of short‐fiber composite base on fracture behavior of direct and indirect restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(7):4543‐4552. doi:10.1007/s00784‐020‐03768‐6
    1. Magne P, Milani T. Short‐fiber reinforced MOD restorations of molars with severely undermined cusps. J Adhes Dent. 2023;25:99‐106. doi:10.3290/j.jad.b4051477
    1. Bijelic‐Donova J, Keulemans F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Direct bilayered biomimetic composite restoration: The effect of a cusp‐supporting short fiber‐reinforced base design on the chewing fracture resistance and failure mode of molars with or without endodontic treatment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103554. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103554
    1. Atalay C, Yazici AR, Horuztepe A, Nagas E, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk fill, bulk fill Flowable, fiber‐reinforced, and conventional resin composite. Oper Dent. 2016;41(5):E131‐E140. doi:10.2341/15‐320‐L
    1. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29‐38. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020

Substances

LinkOut - more resources