Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Dec;50(6):2937-2945.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02616-6. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Lack of standardisation in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures: a multicentre experience

Christina Hörmandinger  1 , David Bitschi  1 , Daniel P Berthold  1 , Claas Neidlein  1 , Lennart Schroeder  1 , Julius Watrinet  2 , Robert Pätzold  2 , Wolfgang Böcker  1 , Boris Michael Holzapfel  1 , Julian Fürmetz  1   2 , Markus Bormann  3
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Lack of standardisation in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures: a multicentre experience

Christina Hörmandinger et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, the trauma mechanisms and fracture types in tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have changed. At the same time, treatment strategies have expanded with the establishment of new classification systems, extension of diagnostics and surgical strategies. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment strategies are rare. The aim of this study is to assess the extent of standardization in the treatment of complex TPF.

Material and methods: For the study, specialists in trauma surgery/orthopaedics were presented thin-slice CT data sets of three complex TPFs including 3D reconstructions. A standardized questionnaire on fracture morphology and planned treatment strategy was then completed.

Results: A total of 23 surgeons from 7 hospitals (Trauma center levels I-III) were included. All three fractures were most frequently classified as Schatzker type V (fracture I: 52.2%, II: 56.5%, III: 60%). Averaged over all three fractures, 55% of the respondents chose the same patient positioning. The combination of a posteromedial and anterolateral approach was the most frequently chosen approach at 42.7%. Double plating was favored for the surgical treatment of all fractures (70.7%). Preoperative MRI, extended approaches and intraoperative fraturoscopy were significantly more common in level I trauma centres.

Conclusion: There are major differences in the management of complex TPF. 360° treatment is carried out in all departments regardless of the level of care, but without further standardization in terms of preoperative imaging, classification, initial treatment, approach, fixation and intraoperative imaging. There are major differences within the departments with different level of care.

Keywords: Fracture classification; Fracture register; Osteosynthesis; Perioperative imaging; Tibial plateau fracture (TPF); Treatment standard.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: All Authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patentlicensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CT (axial and sagittal, coronal not shown) of the three cases. a case 1, b case 2, c case 3
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
3D CT reconstruction of the three cases a case 1, b case 2, c case 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schatzker classification—distribution of the selected classification based on the cases
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ten-segment classification—frequency of the selected segments
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Frequency of approach and plate positioning. AM anteromedial, AL anterolateral, PC posterocentral, PM posteromedial, PL posterolateral, MPP medial parapatellar
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie e.V. (DGOU). [Tibial head fractures. Version 1.0 (29.10.2021)] 2022. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/187-042l_S2k_Tibiakopffrakt... (accessed October 3, 2022).
    1. Bitschi D, Fürmetz J, Gilbert F, Jörgens M, Watrinet J, Pätzold R, et al. Preoperative mixed-reality visualization of complex tibial plateau fractures and its benefit compared to CT and 3D printing. JCM. 2023;12:1785. 10.3390/jcm12051785. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dust T, Hartel MJ, Henneberg J-E, Korthaus A, Ballhause TM, Keller J, et al. The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;49:189–99. 10.1007/s00068-022-02055-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krause M, Frosch K-H. Change in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022;125:527–34. 10.1007/s00113-022-01165-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bormann M, Neidlein C, Gassner C, Keppler AM, Bogner-Flatz V, Ehrnthaller C, et al. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of tibial plateau fractures: a 10-year review at a level-I trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022. 10.1007/s00068-022-02076-w. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types