Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
- PMID: 39095627
- PMCID: PMC11465022
- DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09918-7
Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose of review: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a commonly performed procedure to treat degenerative conditions of the shoulder. With its growing utilization, techniques to reliably diagnose and treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have become increasingly important. In this review we outline the current research and prevention methods of prosthetic joint infection in rTSA. This includes preoperative considerations, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment algorithms.
Recent findings: There is currently no established standardized protocol for preoperative infection prevention or post operative management. However, recent studies have identified risk factors for infection, as well as successful prevention techniques that can be implemented to minimize infection risk. Although there is no standardized protocol currently utilized to diagnose and treat shoulder PJI, we outline a potential set of preventative measures and postoperative management strategies that clinicians can use to properly diagnose and treat patients with this difficult condition.
Keywords: Prevention; Prosthetic Joint Infection; Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty; Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty; Shoulder.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Chalmers reports personal fees from Depuy-Mitek, personal fees from Exactech, personal fees from DJ Orthopaedics, personal fees from Smith and Nephew, personal fees from Depuy, personal fees from Exactech, personal fees from Responsive Arthroscopy, personal fees from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, personal fees from TitinKM Biomedical, outside the submitted work;.
Peter N. Chalmers: is a paid consultant for Depuy-Mitek, Exactech, DJ Orthopaedics, and Smith and Nephew; received intellectual property royalties from Depuy, Exactech, and Responsive Arthroscopy; receives publishing royalties from the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, and has stock in TitinKM Biomedical.
References
-
- Jarrett CD, Brown BT, Schmidt CC. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44(3):389–408. 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.03.010. - PubMed
-
- Wagner ER, Farley KX, Higgins I, Wilson JM, Daly CA, Gottschalk MB. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(12):2601–9. 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049. - PubMed
-
- Lemmens L, Geelen H, Depypere M, De Munter P, Verhaegen F, Zimmerli W, et al. Management of periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30(11):2514–22. 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.014. - PubMed
-
- Moeini S, Rasmussen JV, Salomonsson B, Domeij-Arverud E, Fenstad AM, Hole R, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher risk of revision due to infection than anatomical shoulder arthroplasty: 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Bone Joint J. 2019;101–b(6):702–7. 10.1302/0301-620x.101b6.Bjj-2018-1348.R1. - PubMed
-
- Somerson JS, Hsu JE, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd. Analysis of 4063 complications of shoulder arthroplasty reported to the US Food and Drug Administration from 2012 to 2016. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(11):1978–86. 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.025. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
