Preventability of injury-related morbidity & mortality at four hospitals in Cameroon: A systematic approach to trauma quality improvement
- PMID: 39095973
- PMCID: PMC11563858
- DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12303
Preventability of injury-related morbidity & mortality at four hospitals in Cameroon: A systematic approach to trauma quality improvement
Abstract
Background: Adverse events reviews are a fundamental component of trauma quality improvement (QI) that facilitate the correction of systemic issues in care. Although injury-related mortality in Cameroon is substantial, to our knowledge, opportunities for QI have not been formally assessed. Thus, a formal review of adverse events in Cameroonian trauma patients was implemented as a first step toward identifying targets for systems modification.
Methods: A QI committee composed of multidisciplinary experts at four hospitals in Cameroon was formed to review adverse events including deaths among trauma patients from 2019 to 2021. Events were discussed at newly established morbidity and mortality conferences and committee meetings to identify contributing factors and overall preventability.
Results: During 50 meetings, 95 adverse events were reviewed, including 58 deaths (61%). Other adverse events were delays in diagnosis/treatment (22%) and surgical site infections (17%). Overall, 34 deaths (59%) were classified as preventable, 21% potentially preventable, and 21% not preventable. Over half (52%) of the 46 preventable or potentially preventable deaths occurred in the emergency department (ED); while brain injury (57%), respiratory failure (41%), and hemorrhage (39%) were the most frequent physiologic factors associated with mortality. Contributory factors identified include lack of a structured approach to patient management, absence of continuous training for personnel, and locally adapted protocols.
Conclusions: Basic improvements in evaluation and management of life-threatening issues in the ED can significantly reduce the high rate of preventable trauma-related deaths across Cameroon. Formal trauma QI methods can be utilized in low-resource environments to determine mortality root causes and identify intervention targets.
Keywords: global surgery; low‐and‐middle‐income country; quality improvement; sub‐Saharan Africa; trauma.
© 2024 The Author(s). World Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Mock C, Joshipura M, Arreola-Risa C, Quansah R (2012) An Estimate of the Number of Lives that Could be Saved through Improvements in Trauma Care Globally. World J Surg 36:959–963. - PubMed
-
- Hornor MA, Hoeft C, Nathens AB (2018) Quality Benchmarking in Trauma: from the NTDB to TQIP. Curr Trauma Rep 4:160–169.
-
- Juillard CJ, Mock C, Goosen J, et al. (2009) Establishing the evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO-IATSIC review. World journal of surgery 33:1075–1086. - PubMed
-
- Chadbunchachai W, Saranrittichai S, Sriwiwat S, et al. (2003) Study on performance following Key Performance Indicators for trauma care: Khon Kaen Hospital 2000. J Medical Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet 86:1–7 - PubMed
-
- Hashmi ZG, Haider AH, Zafar SN, et al. (2013) Hospital-based trauma quality improvement initiatives: first step toward improving trauma outcomes in the developing world. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 75:60–8-discussion 68. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
