Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 5;111(9):2059-2069.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Co-observation of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes: Results from analysis of the BRIDGES sequencing dataset

Aimee L Davidson  1 Kyriaki Michailidou  2 Michael T Parsons  1 Cristina Fortuno  1 Manjeet K Bolla  3 Qin Wang  3 Joe Dennis  3 Marc Naven  3 Mustapha Abubakar  4 Thomas U Ahearn  4 M Rosario Alonso  5 Irene L Andrulis  6 Antonis C Antoniou  3 Päivi Auvinen  7 Sabine Behrens  8 Marina A Bermisheva  9 Natalia V Bogdanova  10 Stig E Bojesen  11 Thomas Brüning  12 Helen J Byers  13 Nicola J Camp  14 Archie Campbell  15 Jose E Castelao  16 Melissa H Cessna  17 Jenny Chang-Claude  18 Stephen J Chanock  4 Georgia Chenevix-Trench  19 NBCS CollaboratorsJ Margriet Collée  20 Kamila Czene  21 Thilo Dörk  22 Mikael Eriksson  21 D Gareth Evans  23 Peter A Fasching  24 Jonine D Figueroa  25 Henrik Flyger  26 Manuela Gago-Dominguez  27 Montserrat García-Closas  28 Gord Glendon  29 Anna González-Neira  5 Felix Grassmann  30 Jacek Gronwald  31 Pascal Guénel  32 Andreas Hadjisavvas  33 Lothar Haeberle  24 Per Hall  34 Ute Hamann  35 Mikael Hartman  36 Peh Joo Ho  37 Maartje J Hooning  38 Reiner Hoppe  39 Anthony Howell  40 kConFab InvestigatorsAnna Jakubowska  41 Elza K Khusnutdinova  42 Vessela N Kristensen  43 Jingmei Li  44 Joanna Lim  45 Annika Lindblom  46 Jenny Liu  47 Artitaya Lophatananon  48 Arto Mannermaa  49 Dimitrios A Mavroudis  50 Arjen R Mensenkamp  51 Roger L Milne  52 Kenneth R Muir  48 William G Newman  23 Nadia Obi  53 Mihalis I Panayiotidis  33 Sue K Park  54 Tjoung-Won Park-Simon  22 Paolo Peterlongo  55 Paolo Radice  56 Muhammad U Rashid  57 Valerie Rhenius  3 Emmanouil Saloustros  58 Elinor J Sawyer  59 Marjanka K Schmidt  60 Petra Seibold  8 Mitul Shah  61 Melissa C Southey  62 Soo Hwang Teo  63 Ian Tomlinson  64 Diana Torres  65 Thérèse Truong  32 Irma van de Beek  66 Annemieke H van der Hout  67 Camilla C Wendt  68 Alison M Dunning  61 Paul D P Pharoah  69 Peter Devilee  70 Douglas F Easton  71 Paul A James  72 Amanda B Spurdle  73
Collaborators, Affiliations

Co-observation of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes: Results from analysis of the BRIDGES sequencing dataset

Aimee L Davidson et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

Co-observation of a gene variant with a pathogenic variant in another gene that explains the disease presentation has been designated as evidence against pathogenicity for commonly used variant classification guidelines. Multiple variant curation expert panels have specified, from consensus opinion, that this evidence type is not applicable for the classification of breast cancer predisposition gene variants. Statistical analysis of sequence data for 55,815 individuals diagnosed with breast cancer from the BRIDGES sequencing project was undertaken to formally assess the utility of co-observation data for germline variant classification. Our analysis included expected loss-of-function variants in 11 breast cancer predisposition genes and pathogenic missense variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53. We assessed whether co-observation of pathogenic variants in two different genes occurred more or less often than expected under the assumption of independence. Co-observation of pathogenic variants in each of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 with the remaining genes was less frequent than expected. This evidence for depletion remained after adjustment for age at diagnosis, study design (familial versus population-based), and country. Co-observation of a variant of uncertain significance in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 with a pathogenic variant in another breast cancer gene equated to supporting evidence against pathogenicity following criterion strength assignment based on the likelihood ratio and showed utility in reclassification of missense BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants identified in BRIDGES. Our approach has applicability for assessing the value of co-observation as a predictor of variant pathogenicity in other clinical contexts, including for gene-specific guidelines developed by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels.

Keywords: ACMG/AMP; BP5; breast cancer; co-observation; genetics; sequencing data; variant classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests P.A.F. conducts research funded by Amgen, Novartis, and Pfizer. He received Honoraria from Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer. A.R.M. received funds from AstraZeneca for contribution to sponsored quality assessments and variant interpretation of VUSs in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The funds were paid to the institution.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Observation of pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary breast cancer genes within the BRIDGES breast cancer-affected cohort The BRIDGES breast cancer affected cohort consists of 55,815 individuals. (A) Number of unique PVs observed in the cohort. (B) Number of PVs observed within the cohort with the proportion of individuals with at least one PV in the designated gene given above bars. (C) Number of PV co-observations, shown for each gene pair. PVs in CDH1 or PTEN were not co-observed with a PV in another gene. Final figure formatting performed using Inkscape (v.0.92.3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm H.L., Berg J.S., Brooks L.D., Bustamante C.D., Evans J.P., Landrum M.J., Ledbetter D.H., Maglott D.R., Martin C.L., Nussbaum R.L., et al. ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:2235–2242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee K., Krempely K., Roberts M.E., Anderson M.J., Carneiro F., Chao E., Dixon K., Figueiredo J., Ghosh R., Huntsman D., et al. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline CDH1 sequence variants. Hum. Mutat. 2018;39:1553–1568. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo X., Maciaszek J.L., Thompson B.A., Leong H.S., Dixon K., Sousa S., Anderson M., Roberts M.E., Lee K., Spurdle A.B., et al. Optimising clinical care through CDH1-specific germline variant curation: improvement of clinical assertions and updated curation guidelines. J. Med. Genet. 2022;60:568–575. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mester J.L., Ghosh R., Pesaran T., Huether R., Karam R., Hruska K.S., Costa H.A., Lachlan K., Ngeow J., Barnholtz-Sloan J., et al. Gene-specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: Recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel. Hum. Mutat. 2018;39:1581–1592. - PMC - PubMed