Co-observation of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes: Results from analysis of the BRIDGES sequencing dataset
- PMID: 39096911
- PMCID: PMC11393698
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.004
Co-observation of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes: Results from analysis of the BRIDGES sequencing dataset
Abstract
Co-observation of a gene variant with a pathogenic variant in another gene that explains the disease presentation has been designated as evidence against pathogenicity for commonly used variant classification guidelines. Multiple variant curation expert panels have specified, from consensus opinion, that this evidence type is not applicable for the classification of breast cancer predisposition gene variants. Statistical analysis of sequence data for 55,815 individuals diagnosed with breast cancer from the BRIDGES sequencing project was undertaken to formally assess the utility of co-observation data for germline variant classification. Our analysis included expected loss-of-function variants in 11 breast cancer predisposition genes and pathogenic missense variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53. We assessed whether co-observation of pathogenic variants in two different genes occurred more or less often than expected under the assumption of independence. Co-observation of pathogenic variants in each of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 with the remaining genes was less frequent than expected. This evidence for depletion remained after adjustment for age at diagnosis, study design (familial versus population-based), and country. Co-observation of a variant of uncertain significance in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 with a pathogenic variant in another breast cancer gene equated to supporting evidence against pathogenicity following criterion strength assignment based on the likelihood ratio and showed utility in reclassification of missense BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants identified in BRIDGES. Our approach has applicability for assessing the value of co-observation as a predictor of variant pathogenicity in other clinical contexts, including for gene-specific guidelines developed by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels.
Keywords: ACMG/AMP; BP5; breast cancer; co-observation; genetics; sequencing data; variant classification.
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests P.A.F. conducts research funded by Amgen, Novartis, and Pfizer. He received Honoraria from Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer. A.R.M. received funds from AstraZeneca for contribution to sponsored quality assessments and variant interpretation of VUSs in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The funds were paid to the institution.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel.Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 5;111(9):2044-2058. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Aug 13. Am J Hum Genet. 2024. PMID: 39142283 Free PMC article.
-
Whole-genome sequencing reveals clinically relevant insights into the aetiology of familial breast cancers.Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1071-1079. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz132. Ann Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31090900 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 genomic alterations among 924 Taiwanese breast cancer assays with tumor-only targeted sequencing: extended data analysis from the VGH-TAYLOR study.Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 14;25(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01751-z. Breast Cancer Res. 2023. PMID: 38098088 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency of heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in genes for Fanconi anemia in patients with non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(2):465-476. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05710-6. Epub 2020 Jun 2. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020. PMID: 32488392
-
Current review of TP53 pathogenic germline variants in breast cancer patients outside Li-Fraumeni syndrome.Hum Mutat. 2018 Dec;39(12):1764-1773. doi: 10.1002/humu.23656. Epub 2018 Oct 3. Hum Mutat. 2018. PMID: 30240537 Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel.Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 5;111(9):2044-2058. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Aug 13. Am J Hum Genet. 2024. PMID: 39142283 Free PMC article.
-
Double Heterozygous Pathogenic Variants in TP53 and CHEK2 in Boy with Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 25;25(21):11489. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111489. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39519042 Free PMC article.
-
Population-based study of recurrent DNA damage response gene variants in breast cancer cases.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 May;211(1):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07634-5. Epub 2025 Feb 26. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 40009290 Free PMC article.
-
DEK promotes mammary hyperplasia and is associated with H3K27me3 epigenetic modifications.Life Sci Alliance. 2025 Jun 25;8(9):e202503230. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202503230. Print 2025 Sep. Life Sci Alliance. 2025. PMID: 40562540 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Luo X., Maciaszek J.L., Thompson B.A., Leong H.S., Dixon K., Sousa S., Anderson M., Roberts M.E., Lee K., Spurdle A.B., et al. Optimising clinical care through CDH1-specific germline variant curation: improvement of clinical assertions and updated curation guidelines. J. Med. Genet. 2022;60:568–575. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous