Dissemination of health content through social networks: YouTube and opioid use disorders
- PMID: 39098570
- PMCID: PMC11431156
- DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209475
Dissemination of health content through social networks: YouTube and opioid use disorders
Abstract
Introduction: Most Americans now access social media platforms, including YouTube, to obtain health information. However, few studies have evaluated the quality of YouTube content related to opioid use disorder (OUD), including medications for OUD (MOUD; buprenorphine) and harm reduction resources (e.g., naloxone). The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis was to assess the quality, accuracy, and reliability of MOUD and harm reduction-related video content available on YouTube.
Methods: The study team conducted a YouTube search between June 2022 and July 2022 using key words related to MOUD and harm reduction content (e.g., "suboxone," "methadone," "Narcan"). The 5 most viewed videos from each search term were analyzed for quality (i.e., Global Quality Scale; GQS), accuracy (i.e., JAMA Benchmark Criteria), and reliability (i.e., DISCERN). Videos that were non-English, duplicate, or that did not directly mention OUD, MOUD, or harm reduction were excluded from the review (N = 6).
Results: YouTube videos (N = 70) were mostly produced by medical professionals (27.1 %), independent nonmedical users (21.4 %; e.g., vloggers, individuals documenting their experiences), medical organizations (17.1 %; e.g., hospitals, treatment programs), and/or media (14.3 %; e.g., news agencies). The target audience was primarily the general public (65.7 %), people who use opioids (20.0 %), and healthcare providers (10.0 %). Videos containing MOUD content (N = 64, 61.4 %) mostly focused on suboxone (25.0 %), methadone (23.4 %), Sublocade (14.1 %), and subutex/buprenorphine (14.1 %). The median quality score was 2 based on the GQS with 3 videos receiving the highest quality rating (5). Two videos were highly rated for accuracy per all three JAMA Benchmark criteria. Videos produced by nonmedical educational channels had the highest overall reliability scores on the DISCERN criteria (median 4), followed by medical professionals (median 3), and medical organizations (median 2.5).
Conclusion: The overall quality, accuracy, and reliability of MOUD and harm reduction related content posted on YouTube is poor. The lack of evidence-based content posted on YouTube reinforces the need for public health expert involvement in disseminating guideline-based content on social media.
Keywords: Opioid addiction treatment; Public health; Social media; Web-based health information; YouTube.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Lee has received in-kind study drug for recent and current NIDA-funded trials from Alkermes Inc. and Indivior PLC. Dr. Lee has received a recent investigator sponsored study grant from Indivior PLC. Dr. Lee is a science advisor to Oar Health LLC. Dr. Tofighi is a consultant to Oar Health LLC.
Similar articles
-
The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 8;7(7):e29942. doi: 10.2196/29942. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34081599 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39334090 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15. J Pediatr Urol. 2021. PMID: 34756784
-
A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability.Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1942286. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Phys Sportsmed. 2022. PMID: 34121601 Review.
-
YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.Spine Deform. 2023 Jan;11(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20. Spine Deform. 2023. PMID: 35986883 Review.
References
-
- Auxier B, & Anderson M (2021, April 7). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. Retrieved July 15, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
-
- Ceci L. (2022, March 15). Percentage of U.S. internet users who use YouTube as of 3rd quarter 2020, by age group. Statista. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/296227/us-youtube-reach-age-gender/
-
- Chan C, Sounderajah V, Daniels E, Acharya A, Clarke J, Yalamanchili S, Normahani P, Markar S, Ashrafian H, & Darzi A (2021). The reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of public health information regarding COVID-19 vaccination: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 7(1), e29942–e29942. 10.2196/29942 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical