Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 15;15(7):1477-1488.
doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i7.1477.

Association between glucose levels of children with type 1 diabetes and parental economic status in mobile health application

Affiliations

Association between glucose levels of children with type 1 diabetes and parental economic status in mobile health application

Wen-Hao Zhang et al. World J Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: The glycemic control of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may be influenced by the economic status of their parents.

Aim: To investigate the association between parental economic status and blood glucose levels of children with T1D using a mobile health application.

Methods: Data from children with T1D in China's largest T1D online community, Tang-TangQuan®. Blood glucose levels were uploaded every three months and parental economic status was evaluated based on annual household income. Children were divided into three groups: Low-income (< 30000 Yuan), middle-income (30000-100000 Yuan), and high-income (> 100000 yuan) (1 Yuan = 0.145 United States Dollar approximately). Blood glucose levels were compared among the groups and associations were explored using Spearman's correlation analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: From September 2015 to August 2022, 1406 eligible children with T1D were included (779 female, 55.4%). Median age was 8.1 years (Q1-Q3: 4.6-11.6) and duration of T1D was 0.06 years (0.02-0.44). Participants were divided into three groups: Low-income (n = 320), middle-income (n = 724), and high-income (n = 362). Baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were comparable among the three groups (P = 0.072). However, at month 36, the low-income group had the highest HbA1c levels (P = 0.036). Within three years after registration, glucose levels increased significantly in the low-income group but not in the middle-income and high-income groups. Parental economic status was negatively correlated with pre-dinner glucose (r = -0.272, P = 0.012). After adjustment for confounders, parental economic status remained a significant factor related to pre-dinner glucose levels (odds ratio = 13.02, 95%CI: 1.99 to 126.05, P = 0.002).

Conclusion: The blood glucose levels of children with T1D were negatively associated with parental economic status. It is suggested that parental economic status should be taken into consideration in the management of T1D for children.

Keywords: Children and adolescents; Economic status; Glycemic control; Mobile health application; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of hemoglobin A1c and preprandial blood glucose level: Low vs middle vs high household income groups. A: Comparison of hemoglobin A1c level among three groups; B: Comparison of pre-breakfast blood glucose level among three groups; C: Comparison of pre-lunch blood glucose level among three groups; D: Comparison of pre-dinner blood glucose level among three groups. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01. HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1c.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of postprandial and bedtime blood glucose level: Low vs Middle vs High household income groups. A: Comparison of post-breakfast 2 h blood glucose level among three groups; B: Comparison of post-lunch 2 h blood glucose level among three groups; C: Comparison of post-dinner 2 h blood glucose level among three groups; D: Comparison of bedtime blood glucose level among three groups. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01. HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1c.

References

    1. Katsarou A, Gudbjörnsdottir S, Rawshani A, Dabelea D, Bonifacio E, Anderson BJ, Jacobsen LM, Schatz DA, Lernmark Å. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17016. - PubMed
    1. Gregory GA, Robinson TIG, Linklater SE, Wang F, Colagiuri S, de Beaufort C, Donaghue KC International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas Type 1 Diabetes in Adults Special Interest Group, Magliano DJ, Maniam J, Orchard TJ, Rai P, Ogle GD. Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10:741–760. - PubMed
    1. Catherine JP, Russell MV, Peter CH. The impact of race and socioeconomic factors on paediatric diabetes. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;42:101186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardona-Hernandez R, Schwandt A, Alkandari H, Bratke H, Chobot A, Coles N, Corathers S, Goksen D, Goss P, Imane Z, Nagl K, O'Riordan SMP, Jefferies C SWEET Study Group. Glycemic Outcome Associated With Insulin Pump and Glucose Sensor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Data From the International Pediatric Registry SWEET. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:1176–1184. - PubMed
    1. de Bock M, Codner E, Craig ME, Huynh T, Maahs DM, Mahmud FH, Marcovecchio L, DiMeglio LA. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Glycemic targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young people with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23:1270–1276. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources