Many Paths to the Summit: Survey of Step 1 Study Methods with Pass/Fail Scoring
- PMID: 39099856
- PMCID: PMC11296993
- DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02072-2
Many Paths to the Summit: Survey of Step 1 Study Methods with Pass/Fail Scoring
Abstract
Introduction: After the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) shifted the Step 1 licensure exam to pass/fail, there have been limited studies to analyze changes in student study strategies.
Material and methods: Surveys were distributed to third- and fourth-year medical students at the University of Michigan Medical School (UMMS). The response rate was 66%.
Results: The largest proportion (18.81%) of students chose 8 weeks of study time. 40.59% of students increased the length of their study period. To determine time allocated for dedicated study, 37.26% of respondents consulted near-peers who had already taken Step 1. Students also considered prior experiences with standardized tests (15.57%), personal reasons (14.62%), and conversations with school advisors (13.21%). 44.55% of students studied for 9-11 h a day, and 42.57% studied for 5-8 h a day. 52.69% of students scored between 70 and 80% on their final practice NBME test before their Step 1 exam. One hundred percent of respondents passed the exam. Exam non-extenders achieved higher end average practice test scores with shorter study periods. No differences in Step 1 study time or intensity were found when comparing students by intended specialty competitiveness.
Conclusion: Our results demonstrated patterns in study strategies for the new pass/fail Step 1 exam that may prove useful for curriculum design and schedule plan for future cohorts.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02072-2.
Keywords: Medical school; NBME; Standardized testing; USMLE Step 1.
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to International Association of Medical Science Educators 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing InterestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




References
-
- Summary Report and Preliminary Recommendations from the Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring. Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (INCUS). 2019. https://www.usmle.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/incus_summary_report.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2024.
-
- Performance data. 2024. https://www.usmle.org/performance-data. Accessed 8 April 2024.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources