Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 6:5:100319.
doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100319. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

Clinician-patient communication about cancer treatment misinformation: The Misinformation Response Model

Affiliations

Clinician-patient communication about cancer treatment misinformation: The Misinformation Response Model

M Devyn Mullis et al. PEC Innov. .

Abstract

Objective: Cancer treatment misinformation (CTM) is pervasive and impacts patient health outcomes. Cancer clinicians play an essential role in addressing CTM. We previously identified four self-reported responses that characterize the communication process clinicians engage in to address CTM. Clinicians 1) work to understand the misinformation; 2) correct the misinformation through education; 3) advise about future online searches; and 4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. We sought to confirm and expand on the model we developed by observing cancer clinicians' communication while addressing CTM with a standardized patient (SP).

Methods: 17 cancer clinicians were audio recorded in a SP encounter, in which a breast cancer SP asked three questions based on CTM. We thematically analyzed transcriptions of the recordings.

Results: Clinicians used four responses with associated strategies and skills to address CTM in a standardized clinical encounter, confirming the previously developed model. The four responses were: (1) work to understand the misinformation; (2) correct the misinformation through education; (3) advise about future online searches; and (4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. This observational approach allowed us to refine strategies within each response and identify communication skills clinicians enact to address CTM.

Conclusion: These findings provide a strong foundation for the Misinformation Response Model for cancer clinicians. Future research should examine which components of the model are most effective in improving patient outcomes.

Innovation: This is the first study observing clinicians' communication through simulated practice with SPs about CTM.

Keywords: Cancer treatment misinformation; Patient education; Physician-patient communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standardized patient scenario sent to participating clinicians.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standardized patient script.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Misinformation Response Model.

References

    1. Hutten R.J., Weil C.R., Barney B.M., et al. Complementary and alternative medicine exposure in oncology (CAMEO) study: a multi-institutional cross-sectional analysis of patients receiving cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl) doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18739. - DOI
    1. Johnson S.B., Parsons M., Dorff T., et al. Cancer misinformation and harmful information on Facebook and other social media: a brief report. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jul 11 2022;114(7):1036–1039. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab141. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson S.B., Bylund C.L. Identifying cancer treatment misinformation and strategies to mitigate its impacts with improved radiation oncologist-patient communication. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023;13(4):282–285. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Feb 2. PMID: 36736620. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Street R.L., Jr., Makoul G., Arora N.K., Epstein R.M. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301. - PubMed
    1. Pan W., Liu D., Fang J. An examination of factors contributing to the acceptance of online health misinformation. Front Psychol. 2021;12 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources