Clinician-patient communication about cancer treatment misinformation: The Misinformation Response Model
- PMID: 39101055
- PMCID: PMC11296260
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100319
Clinician-patient communication about cancer treatment misinformation: The Misinformation Response Model
Abstract
Objective: Cancer treatment misinformation (CTM) is pervasive and impacts patient health outcomes. Cancer clinicians play an essential role in addressing CTM. We previously identified four self-reported responses that characterize the communication process clinicians engage in to address CTM. Clinicians 1) work to understand the misinformation; 2) correct the misinformation through education; 3) advise about future online searches; and 4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. We sought to confirm and expand on the model we developed by observing cancer clinicians' communication while addressing CTM with a standardized patient (SP).
Methods: 17 cancer clinicians were audio recorded in a SP encounter, in which a breast cancer SP asked three questions based on CTM. We thematically analyzed transcriptions of the recordings.
Results: Clinicians used four responses with associated strategies and skills to address CTM in a standardized clinical encounter, confirming the previously developed model. The four responses were: (1) work to understand the misinformation; (2) correct the misinformation through education; (3) advise about future online searches; and (4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. This observational approach allowed us to refine strategies within each response and identify communication skills clinicians enact to address CTM.
Conclusion: These findings provide a strong foundation for the Misinformation Response Model for cancer clinicians. Future research should examine which components of the model are most effective in improving patient outcomes.
Innovation: This is the first study observing clinicians' communication through simulated practice with SPs about CTM.
Keywords: Cancer treatment misinformation; Patient education; Physician-patient communication.
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Hutten R.J., Weil C.R., Barney B.M., et al. Complementary and alternative medicine exposure in oncology (CAMEO) study: a multi-institutional cross-sectional analysis of patients receiving cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl) doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18739. - DOI
-
- Street R.L., Jr., Makoul G., Arora N.K., Epstein R.M. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
