Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Jun;34(6):2203-2216.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.17397. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

Generic and disease-specific self-care instruments in older patients affected by multiple chronic conditions: A descriptive study

Maddalena De Maria  1 , Manuela Saurini  2 , Ilaria Erba  3 , Ercole Vellone  2   4 , Barbara Riegel  5 , Davide Ausili  6 , Maria Matarese  7
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Generic and disease-specific self-care instruments in older patients affected by multiple chronic conditions: A descriptive study

Maddalena De Maria et al. J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Aims: To describe and compare generic and disease-specific self-care measures in patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) in the three dimensions of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management.

Design: Multicentre cross-sectional study.

Methods: Patients aged 65 and over with MCCs. We used Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory to measure generic self-care, Self-care of Diabetes Inventory to measure self-care in diabetes mellitus, Self-Care of Heart Failure (HF) Index to measure self-care in HF, and Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory to measure self-care in chronic lung diseases.

Results: We recruited 896 patients. Multimorbid patients with diabetes had lower scores on the self-care maintenance scale, and diabetic patients in insulin treatment on the generic management scale than on the disease-specific instrument. Multimorbid patients with HF or chronic lung diseases scored higher on generic self-care maintenance and monitoring scales than disease-specific ones. There was a partial consistency between the generic and disease-specific self-care maintenance and management. Inadequate behaviours were recorded in disease-specific self-care monitoring rather than generic ones.

Conclusions: Older patients affected by MCCs scored differently in the generic and disease-specific instruments, showing inadequate self-care in some of the three self-care dimensions.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The choice between generic and disease-specific instruments to use in clinical practice and research should be made considering the specific aims, settings, patients characteristics, and knowledge of the different performance of the instruments by users.

Impact: No study has described and compared generic and specific self-care measures in patients affected by MCCs. Knowing these differences can help nurses choose the most suitable measure for their aims, context, and patients and plan generic and disease-specific self-care educational interventions for those behaviours in which MCCs patients perform poorly.

Patient contribution: Patients were informed about the study, provided informed consent, and answered questionnaires through interviews.

Keywords: chronic illness; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; diabetes; heart failure; instruments; self‐care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Heart Association (AHA). (2017). Classes of Heart Failure. https://cpr.heart.org/en/health‐topics/heart‐failure/what‐is‐heart‐failu...
    1. Al‐Hariri, M. T., Al‐Enazi, A. S., Alshammari, D. M., Bahamdan, A. S., Al‐Khtani, S. M., & Al‐Abdulwahab, A. A. (2017). Descriptive study on the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the diabetic foot. J Taibah Univ Med Sci, 12(6), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.02.001
    1. Almutairi, N., Hosseinzadeh, H., & Gopaldasani, V. (2020). The effectiveness of patient activation intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus glycemic control and self‐management behaviors: A systematic review of RCTs. Primary Care Diabetes, 14(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.009
    1. Arapi, A., Vellone, E., Ivziku, D., Duka, B., Taci, D., Notarnicola, I., De Maria, M., Duka, B., Arapi, A., Prendi, E., Rocco, G., & Stievano, A. (2023). Psychometric characteristics of the self‐Care of Chronic Illness Inventory in older adults living in a middle‐income country. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064714
    1. Ausili, D., Barbaranelli, C., & Riegel, B. (2020). Generalizability of the self‐Care of Diabetes Inventory across Cultures and Languages: Italy and the United States. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 43(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278719840689

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources