Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 1;2024(65):168-179.
doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae013.

Reporting tumor genomic test results to SEER registries via linkages

Affiliations

Reporting tumor genomic test results to SEER registries via linkages

Valentina I Petkov et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. .

Abstract

Background: Precision medicine has become a mainstay of cancer care in recent years. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program has been an authoritative source of cancer statistics and data since 1973. However, tumor genomic information has not been adequately captured in the cancer surveillance data, which impedes population-based research on molecular subtypes. To address this, the SEER Program has developed and implemented a centralized process to link SEER registries' tumor cases with genomic test results that are provided by molecular laboratories to the registries.

Methods: Data linkages were carried out following operating procedures for centralized linkages established by the SEER Program. The linkages used Match*Pro, a probabilistic linkage software, and were facilitated by the registries' trusted third party (an honest broker). The SEER registries provide to NCI limited datasets that undergo preliminary evaluation prior to their release to the research community.

Results: Recently conducted genomic linkages included OncotypeDX Breast Recurrence Score, OncotypeDX Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, OncotypeDX Genomic Prostate Score, Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier, DecisionDX Uveal Melanoma, DecisionDX Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma, DecisionDX Melanoma, and germline tests results in Georgia and California SEER registries.

Conclusions: The linkages of cancer cases from SEER registries with genomic test results obtained from molecular laboratories offer an effective approach for data collection in cancer surveillance. By providing de-identified data to the research community, the NCI's SEER Program enables scientists to investigate numerous research inquiries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of OncotypeDX recurrence score risk categories by race in invasive breast cancer: SEER 17 registries (excluding Alaska Native American Registry) 2004-2017 diagnosis years. DX = diagnosis; RS = recurrence score; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of OncotypeDX DCIS risk categories by race in in situ breast cancer: SEER 17 registries (excluding Alaska Native American Registry) 2011-2017 diagnosis years. “Other” category includes American Indian and Alaska Native and Asian and Pacific Islander. DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ; DX = diagnosis; RS = recurrence score; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Distribution of OncotypeDX GPS risk by race in prostate cancer: SEER 17 registries (excluding Alaska Native American Registry) 2013-2017 diagnosis years. “Other” category includes American Indian and Alaska Native and Asian and Pacific Islander. DX = diagnosis; GPS = genomic prostate score; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Distribution of Decipher Prostate Biopsy (A) and Radical Prostatectomy (B) Genomic Risk Classifier risk groups by race in prostate cancer: SEER 22 registries (excluding Alaska Native American Registry), 2010-2018 diagnosis years. “Other” category includes American Indian and Alaska Native and Asian and Pacific Islander. SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Distribution of DecisionDX Uveal Melanoma risk class by sex: SEER 22 registries (excluding Alaska Native American Registry), 2010-2019 diagnosis years. DX = diagnosis; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Distribution of DecisionDX Skin Melanoma risk class by sex: SEER 22 registries (excluding Alaska Native American Registry), 2010-2019 diagnosis years. DX = diagnosis; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.

References

    1. Mateo J, Steuten L, Aftimos P, et al. Delivering precision oncology to patients with cancer. Nat Med. 2022;28(4):658-665. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01717-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawaji H, Kubo M, Yamashita N, et al. Comprehensive molecular profiling broadens treatment options for breast cancer patients. Cancer Med. 2021;10(2):529-539. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yadav S, Couch FJ. Germline genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the past, present, and future. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:61-74. - PubMed
    1. Roy-Chowdhuri S. Molecular pathology of lung cancer. Surg Pathol Clin 2021;14(3):369-377. - PubMed
    1. Beech C, Hechtman JF. Molecular approach to colorectal carcinoma: current evidence and clinical application. Surg Pathol Clin 2021;14(3):429-441. - PubMed

Grants and funding