Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;45(1):30-35.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02086-z. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

Using a simplified Downes score to predict the receipt of surfactant in a highly resourced setting

Affiliations

Using a simplified Downes score to predict the receipt of surfactant in a highly resourced setting

William Chotas et al. J Perinatol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The Downes score is a neonatal examination scoring tool frequently used to guide initiation of CPAP, but its ability to predict the need for surfactant has not been assessed. We assessed the extent to which the Downes score predicts the receipt of surfactant.

Study design: We calculated a simplified Downes score from nursing admission data for infants (≤ 2000 grams, and ≥ 25 weeks' gestation) admitted on CPAP to a highly resourced level III NICU, to assess the predictive value for the receipt of surfactant.

Results: Fifty-three (31.5%) out of 168 infants admitted on CPAP received surfactant. A simplified Downes score of ≥ 4 predicted the receipt of surfactant with 90.6% sensitivity, 52.2% specificity, 46.6% positive predictive value, 92.3% negative predictive value, and 64.3% accuracy.

Conclusion: The high sensitivity and negative predictive value suggest utility for using the Downes score to help guide clinical decision making regarding surfactant therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: The University of Vermont Institutional Review Board determined that this study was not human subjects research. This analysis of existing data was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Simplification of Downes score.
The Downes score was simplified by: (1) removing the distinction between mild and severe for the presence of retractions, grunting, and decreased air entry; (2) not discriminating between tachypnea ≥ 60 and > 80; and (3) using any FiO2 > 0.21 instead of the presence of cyanosis (FiO2 : fraction of inspired oxygen).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Likelihood of receipt of surfactant per simplified Downes score.
The likelihood of receiving surfactant increased as the simplified Downes score increased.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. ROC Curves for the ability of the simplified Downes score to predict the receipt of surfactant.
The top ROC (A) is without adjustment for gestational age and the bottom (B) is with adjustment for gestational age.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ekhaguere OA, Okonkwo IR, Batra M, Hedstrom AB. Respiratory distress syndrome management in resource limited settings—Current evidence and opportunities in 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:961509. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tochie JN, Sibetcheu AT, Arrey-Ebot PE, Choukem SP. Global, regional and national trends in the burden of neonatal respiratory failure and essentials of its diagnosis and management from 1992 to 2022: a scoping review. Eur J Pediatr [Internet]. 2023. [cited 2023 Dec 14]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00431-023-05238-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamath BD, MacGuire ER, McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Jobe AH. Neonatal mortality from respiratory distress syndrome: lessons for low-resource countries. Pediatrics. 2011;127:1139–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Chandrasekaran A, Agarwal R, Paul VK. Efficacy and safety of CPAP in low- and middle-income countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36:S21–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dargaville PA, Gerber A, Johansson S, De Paoli AG, Kamlin COF, Orsini F, et al. Incidence and Outcome of CPAP Failure in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20153985. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources