Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes
- PMID: 39106552
- PMCID: PMC11681941
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115852
Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes
Abstract
Background: Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals.
Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition.
Results: The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p < 0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p < 0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p = 0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p = 0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10-100.0, p = 0.51).
Conclusions: Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.
Keywords: Elective; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Outcomes; Rural.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing interest We are pleased to submit our original article entitled “Disparities in Outpatient Rural Cholecystectomy Outcomes” for consideration for publication in The American Journal of Surgery. The work included in this submission is our original work. It has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Its publication is approved by all authors, who deny any conflicts of interest. If accepted for publication, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without written consent of the copyright holder.
References
-
- Kent KC, Foley EF, Golden RN. Rural Surgery--A Crisis in Wisconsin. WMJ. 2015;114(2):81–82. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
