CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
- PMID: 39106889
- PMCID: PMC11301009
- DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e225
CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
Abstract
The publication landscape for case reports has undergone a significant shift, with many high-impact journals deprioritizing or ceasing their publication altogether. This trend has led to the emergence of case-based reviews as an alternative to traditional case reports. Several factors drive this shift. Case-based reviews offer a more comprehensive synthesis of the literature compared to single case reports. They employ systematic search methodologies, reducing the risk of excluding relevant data, and providing robust evidence. From a publisher's perspective, case-based reviews have a greater potential for citation. While recommendations exist for writing traditional case reports, such as the CAse REports (CARE) guidelines, there is a lack of published recommendations for composing case-based reviews. This review aims to address this gap by providing guidance on drafting high-quality case-based reviews.
Keywords: Case Reports; Case Studies; Medical Writing; Review; Review Literature; Review of Reported Cases.
© 2024 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
