Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Jun 25:2024.06.24.24309440.
doi: 10.1101/2024.06.24.24309440.

Brain dopamine responses to ultra-processed milkshakes are highly variable and not significantly related to adiposity in humans

Affiliations

Brain dopamine responses to ultra-processed milkshakes are highly variable and not significantly related to adiposity in humans

Valerie L Darcey et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Ultra-processed foods high in fat and sugar may be addictive, in part, due to their purported ability to induce an exaggerated postingestive brain dopamine response akin to drugs of abuse. Using standard [11C]raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) displacement methods used to measure brain dopamine responses to addictive drugs, we measured postingestive striatal dopamine responses to an ultra-processed milkshake high in fat and sugar in 50 young, healthy adults over a wide body mass index range (BMI 20-45 kg/m2). Surprisingly, milkshake consumption did not result in significant postingestive dopamine response in the striatum (p=0.62) nor any striatal subregion (p>0.33) and the highly variable interindividual responses were not significantly related to adiposity (BMI: r=0.076, p=0.51; %body fat: r=0.16, p=0.28). Thus, postingestive striatal dopamine responses to an ultra-processed milkshake were likely substantially smaller than many addictive drugs and below the limits of detection using standard PET methods.

Keywords: Obesity; PET; [11C]raclopride; controlled-feeding; dopamine; striatum; ultra-processed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) An ultra-processed milkshake did not significantly impact [11C]raclopride binding potential (D2BPralco) across the whole sample (n=50) in whole striatum. (B) Distribution of percent change between fasting D2BPralco and D2BPralco after consumption of milkshake, with individuals displaying dopamine release (green, left, “Responders”, n=29) and those who did not (purple, right, “Non-responders”, n=21). (C) Those classified as milkshake “Responders” rated the milkshake as more pleasant (0=“neutral”, 100=“extremely pleasant”) (D) and reported greater wanting (0=“I don’t want any more”, 100=“I want much more of the milkshake”) (E) but similar levels of hunger after an overnight fast compared to “Non-responders
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Postingestive dopamine responses to milkshake correlated with prior fasting hunger and subsequent ad libitum cookie energy intake.
(A) Region of interest (ROI) analyses indicate that self-reported hunger after an overnight fast correlated with dopamine response to milkshake consumption, particularly in the left putamen. (B) The ROI relationship between hunger and dopamine response, was supported by voxelwise correlation analysis which identified two clusters surviving correction for multiple comparisons (left putamen: 106 voxels; x = 22.8, y=−6.0, z= 13.5; p<0.01; and right caudate: 39 voxels; x = –15.8, y = −20.0, z = 6.5; p<0.05). (C) Additionally, ROI analyses indicate that the postingestive dopamine response to milkshake particularly in the left putamen was correlated with ad libitum intake of energy from cookies at a subsequent meal test in the overnight fasted state. (D) Voxelwise analyses identified clusters in bilateral putamen surviving correction for multiple comparisons where dopamine response was correlated with subsequent ad libitum cookie consumption (left putamen: 41 voxels, x = 29.8, y= 11.5, z= 6.6; p<0.02; right putamen: 34 voxels, x = 26.2, y= 11.5, z= 6.5; p=0.05). All clusters defined by NN=1 (faces touching), ke=20, bi-sided puncorr<0.1, and cluster corrected at p<0.05

References

    1. Benowitz N. L. (2010). “Nicotine addiction.” N Engl J Med 362(24): 2295–2303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breier A., Su T.-P., Saunders R., Carson R., Kolachana B., de Bartolomeis A., Weinberger D., Weisenfeld N., Malhotra A. and Eckelman W. (1997). “Schizophrenia is associated with elevated amphetamine-induced synaptic dopamine concentrations: evidence from a novel positron emission tomography method.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94(6): 2569–2574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burcham S., Liu Y., Merianos A. L. and Mendy A. (2023). “Outliers in nutrient intake data for U.S. adults: national health and nutrition examination survey 2017–2018.” Epidemiol Methods 12(1): 20230018. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burger K. S. and Stice E. (2012). “Frequent ice cream consumption is associated with reduced striatal response to receipt of an ice cream-based milkshake.” The American journal of clinical nutrition 95(4): 810–817. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cárdenas L., Houle S., Kapur S. and Busto U. E. (2004). “Oral D-amphetamine causes prolonged displacement of [11C]raclopride as measured by PET.” Synapse 51(1): 27–31. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources