Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 1;39(4):daae085.
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae085.

Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada)

Affiliations

Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada)

Stephanie Radziszewski et al. Health Promot Int. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Intersectoral collaborations are recommended as effective strategies to reduce health inequalities. People most affected by health inequalities, as are people living in poverty, remain generally absent from such intersectoral collaborations. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects can be leveraged to better understand how to involve people with lived experience to support both individual and community empowerment. In this paper, we offer a critical reflection on a CBPR project conducted in public housing in Québec, Canada, that aimed to develop intersectoral collaboration between tenants and senior executives from four sectors (housing, health, city and community organizations). This single qualitative case study design consisted of fieldwork documents, observations and semi-structured interviews. Using the Emancipatory Power Framework (EPF) and the Limiting Power Framework (LPF), we describe examples of types of power and resistance shown by the tenants, the intersectoral partners and the research team. The discussion presents lessons learned through the study, including the importance for research teams to reflect on their own power, especially when aiming to reduce health inequalities. The paper concludes by describing the limitations of the analyses conducted through the EPF-LPF frameworks and suggestions to increase the transformative power of future studies.

Keywords: community-based participatory research; health promotion; intersectoral collaboration; power; public housing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Angus, L., Dall, A. and Ghosal, R. (2023) Catalyzing alignment and systems transformation through cross‐sector partnerships: findings from the California accountable communities for health initiative. Health Services Research, 59, 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. August, M. (2014) Challenging the rhetoric of stigmatization: the benefits of concentrated poverty in Toronto’s Regent Park. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46, 1317–1333.
    1. Benfer, E. A., Vlahov, D., Long, M. Y., Walker-Wells, E., Pottenger, J. L., Gonsalves, G.. et al.. (2021) Eviction, health inequity, and the spread of COVID-19: housing policy as a primary pandemic mitigation strategy. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 98, 1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bond, L., Kearns, A., Mason, P., Tannahill, C., Egan, M. and Whitely, E. (2012) Exploring the relationships between housing, neighbourhoods and mental well-being for residents of deprived areas. BMC Public Health, 12, 48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). (2022) Canada’sHousing Supply Shortages: Estimating What Is Needed to Solve Canada’s Housing Affordability Crisis by 2030. Author. https://assets.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/sites/cmhc/professional/housing-markets-d...(last accessed June 2023).