Association of trauma classifications to long-term outcome in blunt trauma patients
- PMID: 39110178
- PMCID: PMC11599534
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02606-8
Association of trauma classifications to long-term outcome in blunt trauma patients
Abstract
Purpose: The impact of major trauma is long lasting. Although polytrauma patients are currently identified with the Berlin polytrauma criteria, data on long-term outcomes are not available. In this study, we evaluated the association of trauma classification with long-term outcome in blunt-trauma patients.
Methods: A trauma registry of a level I trauma centre was used for patient identification from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2015. Patients were grouped as follows: (1) all severely injured trauma patients; (2) all severely injured polytrauma patients; 2a) severely injured patients with AIS ≥ 3 on two different body regions (Berlin-); 2b) severely injured patients with polytrauma and a physiological criterion (Berlin+); and (3) a non-polytrauma group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate differences in mortality between different groups.
Results: We identified 3359 trauma patients for this study. Non-polytrauma was the largest group (2380 [70.9%] patients). A total of 500 (14.9%) patients fulfilled the criteria for Berlin + definition, leaving 479 (14.3%) polytrauma patients in Berlin- group. Berlin + patients had the highest short-term mortality compared with other groups, although the difference in cumulative mortality gradually plateaued compared with the non-polytrauma patient group; at the end of the 10-year follow up, the non-polytrauma group had the greatest mortality due to the high number of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Conclusion: Excess mortality of polytrauma patients by Berlin definition occurs in the early phase (30-day mortality) and late deaths are rare. TBI causes high early mortality followed by increased long-term mortality.
Keywords: Berlin definition; Mortality; Polytrauma; Trauma; Trauma care; Trauma registry.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This was a retrospective register study. The HUH scientific review board accepted the study (HUS/221/2017). According to Finnish legislation, consent from patients is not needed for a register study of this type. Data for the register were gathered by patient medical chart review. Consent for publication: All authors have read the final draft of the manuscript and give consent for publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- (1971) Rating the severity of tissue damage: I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA: J Am Med Association. 10.1001/jama.1971.03180150059012. - PubMed
-
- States JD. The abbreviated and the comprehensive research injury scales. In: SAE Technical Papers; 1969.
-
- Gennarelli T, e., Woodzin E. (2016) Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. (2016). Abbreviated Injury Scale (c) 2005 Update 2008. Chicago, Illinois.
-
- Baker SP, O’Neill B Jr, Long WH WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–96. - PubMed
-
- Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma. 1997;43:922–6. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources