Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;52(1):263-279.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06866-9. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective

Affiliations

The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective

Luca Filippi et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors. It predominantly affects younger women and is associated with a poor prognosis. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of TNBC patients and to identify future research directions.

Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to February 2024. A team of five researchers conducted data extraction and analysis. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using a specific evaluation form.

Results: Twenty-eight studies involving 2870 TNBC patients were included in the review. Key clinical applications of PET in TNBC included predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), assessing the prognostic value of baseline PET, and initial disease staging. Two studies utilized PSMA-ligand agents, while the majority used [18F]FDG-based PET. Significant associations were found between baseline [18F]FDG uptake and molecular biomarkers such as PDL-1, androgen receptor, and Ki67. Baseline [18F]FDG PET led to the upstaging of patients from stage IIB to stage IV, influencing treatment decisions and survival outcomes. In the NAC setting, serial PET scans measuring changes in [18F]FDG uptake, indicated by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), predicted pCR with varying cut-off values correlated with different response rates. Semiquantitative parameters such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and PET lung index were prognostic for metastatic disease.

Conclusions: In TNBC patients, [18F]FDG PET is essential for initial disease staging in both localized and metastatic settings. It is also useful for assessing treatment response to NAC. The ability of PET to correlate metabolic activity with molecular markers and predict treatment outcomes highlights its potential in TNBC management. Further prospective studies are needed to refine these clinical indications and establish its definitive role.

Keywords: Molecular imaging; PET/CT; Prostate specific membrane antigen; Radiomics; Theranostics; Triple negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethic approval: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflict of interest: the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart indicating the selection process of the included studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graphical representation of the distribution of the entire population of selected studies in relation to the different thematic macro-areas
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 42-year-old woman with newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer of the right breast. (a) upper row: from left to right, whole body PET, axial and coronal slices before NAC showing highly increased tracer uptake within diffuse alteration in right breast (SUVmax 5, arrow) coupled with an enlarged axillary node (SUVmax 9, arrow); (b) lower row: from left to right, whole body PET, axial and coronal images after 2 cycles of NAC depicting a reduction in tracer uptake in the right breast (SUVmax 2.7, arrow), in spite of an increased number of pathological axillary nodes (SUVmax 12), as for dissociated response. Patient was classified as non-responder and a therapy switch was carried out

References

    1. Global Cancer Observatory. https://gco.iarc.fr/en. Accessed 30 May 2024.
    1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1938–48. - PubMed
    1. Li X, Yang J, Peng L, Sahin AA, Huo L, Ward KC, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;161:279–87. - PubMed
    1. Lehmann BD, Pietenpol JA. Identification and use of biomarkers in treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. J Pathol. 2014;232:142–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu B, Natarajan E, Balaji Raghavendran HR, Markandan UD. Molecular classification, treatment, and genetic biomarkers in Triple-negative breast Cancer: a review. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023;22. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources