Letter to the editor for the article "Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies"
- PMID: 39110244
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05180-1
Letter to the editor for the article "Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies"
Comment on
-
Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.World J Urol. 2024 May 14;42(1):318. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05032-y. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38743260 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Giulioni C, Brocca C, Tramanzoli P et al (2024) Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol 42:318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05032-y - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) (2022) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
-
- Doi SAR, Barendregt JJ, Khan S et al (2015) Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials i: the inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp Clin Trials 45:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
