Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct:77:103783.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103783. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Women's views on using artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: A review and qualitative study to guide breast screening services

Affiliations
Review

Women's views on using artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: A review and qualitative study to guide breast screening services

Stacy M Carter et al. Breast. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

As breast screening services move towards use of healthcare AI (HCAI) for screen reading, research on public views of HCAI can inform more person-centered implementation. We synthesise reviews of public views of HCAI in general, and review primary studies of women's views of AI in breast screening. People generally appear open to HCAI and its potential benefits, despite a wide range of concerns; similarly, women are open towards AI in breast screening because of the potential benefits, but are concerned about a wide range of risks. Women want radiologists to remain central; oversight, evaluation and performance, care, equity and bias, transparency, and accountability are key issues; women may be less tolerant of AI error than of human error. Using our recent Australian primary study, we illustrate both the value of informing participants before collecting data, and women's views. The 40 screening-age women in this study stipulated four main conditions on breast screening AI implementation: 1) maintaining human control; 2) strong evidence of performance; 3) supporting familiarisation with AI; and 4) providing adequate reasons for introducing AI. Three solutions were offered to support familiarisation: transparency and information; slow and staged implementation; and allowing women to opt-out of AI reading. We provide recommendations to guide both implementation of AI in healthcare and research on public views of HCAI. Breast screening services should be transparent about AI use and share information about breast screening AI with women. Implementation should be slow and staged, providing opt-out options if possible. Screening services should demonstrate strong governance to maintain clinician control, demonstrate excellent AI system performance, assure data protection and bias mitigation, and give good reasons to justify implementation. When these measures are put in place, women are more likely to see HCAI use in breast screening as legitimate and acceptable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Questionnaire responses: How much do you know about artificial intelligence.?.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Questionnaire responses: How much do you support or oppose the use of AI to read mammograms in breast screening programs.?.

References

    1. Degeling C., Barratt A., Aranda S., Bell R., Doust J., Houssami N., et al. Should women aged 70-74 be invited to participate in screening mammography? A report on two Australian community juries. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin J.D., Shelton R.C., Lee Argov E.J., Tehranifar P. Older women's perspectives driving mammography screening use and overuse: a narrative review of mixed-methods studies. Current Epidemiology Reports. 2020;7(4):274–289.
    1. Brotzman L.E., Shelton R.C., Austin J.D., Rodriguez C.B., Agovino M., Moise N., et al. “It's something I'll do until I die”: A qualitative examination into why older women in the U.S. continue screening mammography. Cancer Med. 2022;11(20):3854–3862. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aquino Y.S.J., Rogers W.A., Braunack-Mayer A., Frazer H., Win K.T., Houssami N., et al. Utopia versus dystopia: professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills. Int J Med Inf. 2023;169 - PubMed
    1. Yang L., Ene I.C., Arabi Belaghi R., Koff D., Stein N., Santaguida P. Stakeholders' perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(3):1477–1495. - PubMed