Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;41(12):e15416.
doi: 10.1111/dme.15416. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

Feasibility of caregiver diabetes distress screening in routine clinical care of youth with type 1 diabetes

Affiliations

Feasibility of caregiver diabetes distress screening in routine clinical care of youth with type 1 diabetes

Einas H Alkhatib et al. Diabet Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Aims: Caregiver diabetes distress (DD) consists of feeling overwhelmed, sad, and/or concerned; one-third of parents of youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) report severe distress up to 4 years after T1D diagnosis. PAID-PR (Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey-Parent Revised) assesses DD primarily in research settings; however, less is known about its clinical utility. We aimed to identify the feasibility of implementing PAID-PR screening at a diverse, academic US paediatric diabetes center during routine clinic follow-up visits through quality improvement methodologies.

Methods: The PAID-PR was intended to be offered in English to caregivers at all paediatric T1D appointments, by the front desk during appointment check-in, or through REDCap prior to telehealth appointments or at local sites to all eligible caregivers. Adult psychosocial resources were provided to all, regardless of score. Forms were scored after appointments; scores ≥80 were referred to Diabetes Psychology providers for follow-up.

Results: A total of 391 caregivers completed the PAID-PR, though only half of eligible caregivers received it in person. Response rates were highest in person (90%), compared to REDCap (25%). In total, 27% (n = 107) scored ≥56 (DD). Of those with DD, 21% (n = 23) scored ≥80 and were referred to psychology. Demographics are reported in Table 1. PAID-PR score was positively correlated to A1c (p = 0.038) and inversely to child age (p = 0.014).

Conclusion: Clinic caregiver DD screening was implemented with higher response rates in person; however, expanding in-person screening to all eligible caregivers is necessary. Furthermore, since the PAID-PR was in English, some caregivers with DD were likely missed. Future directions include screening in additional languages.

Keywords: caregiver; endocrinology; parent; psychology; screening; type 1 diabetes; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Streisand R, Mackey ER, Elliot BM, et al. Parental anxiety and depression associated with caring for a child newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: opportunities for education and counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(2):333‐338. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.014
    1. Dennick K, Sturt J, Speight J. What is diabetes distress and how can we measure it? A narrative review and conceptual model. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017;31(5):898‐911. doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.12.018
    1. Jaser SS, Lord JH, Savin K, et al. Developing and testing an intervention to reduce distress in mothers of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018;6(1):19‐30. doi:10.1037/cpp0000220
    1. Bowes S, Lowes L, Warner J, Gregory JW. Chronic sorrow in parents of children with type 1 diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(5):992‐1000. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04963.x
    1. Davis AM, Sawyer DR, Vinci LM. The potential of group visits in diabetes care. Clin Diabetes. 2008;26(2):58‐62. doi:10.2337/diaclin.26.2.58