Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;19(1):2387842.
doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2387842. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy

Malin Hallén  1 , Kristina Tryselius  2
Affiliations

Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy

Malin Hallén et al. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to, in the Swedish media debate, explore the discursive constructions of challenges in human rights and freedoms following the national spatial strategy for health and survival during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: The study, inspired by a critical discourse analytic approach, focused particularly on the issues addressed, subject positions, relations and rhetoric. Seventeen opinion articles published in Swedish national newspapers December 2019 - February 2022 were analysed.

Results: The main contents were threats to democracy, threats to the freedom and rights of specific groups, and threats to the debate itself. Contents were expressed through three discourse dichotomies: contribution vs interjection, documented vs alarmistic, and active on the stage vs commenting from the balcony.

Conclusions: Striking about the results is the absence of dialogue, the one-way communication, and the absent politicians. It seems that the analysed debate on the challenges of the Swedish COVID-19 pandemic strategy, based on its impact on overall freedoms and rights, has not been the focus of decision-makers during the pandemic. They have neither addressed the threats highlighted in the articles, nor contributed to the discourse. This is worrying for the long-term maintenance and development of a healthy democracy.

Keywords: COVID-19; Sweden; discourse; health; human rights; media debate; national strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

    1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
    1. Almström, I., Engblom, R., & Panarese, E. (2020, May 12). Att skydda sin familj bör inte vara olagligt. Svenska Dagbladet.
    1. Andersson, S., & Aylott, N. (2020). Sweden and coronavirus: Unexceptional exceptionalism. Social Sciences, 9(12), 232. 10.3390/socsci9120232 - DOI
    1. Baekkeskov, E., Rubin, O., & Öberg, P. (2021). Monotonous or pluralistic public discourse? reason-giving and dissent in Denmark’s and Sweden’s early 2020 COVID-19 responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(8), 1321–13. 10.1080/13501763.2021.1942158 - DOI
    1. Bahmueller, C. F. (2007). Elements of democracy: The fundamental principles, concepts, social foundations, and processes of democracy. Center for Civic Education.

LinkOut - more resources