Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study
- PMID: 39114910
- PMCID: PMC11232077
- DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508
Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study
Abstract
Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Similar articles
-
Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;49(7):589-93. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000179. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26035518
-
Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;17(10):2034-2041. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 9. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30312788 Clinical Trial.
-
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390910. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Endoscopy. 2015. PMID: 25412094
-
Training interventions to improve adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3870-3882. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07153-7. Epub 2019 Oct 8. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31595401
-
Adenoma and polyp detection rates during insertion versus withdrawal phase of colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):68-76.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32540312
Cited by
-
Effect of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange on the incidence of hypoxemia in sedated gastroscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Pediatr. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-06075-9. BMC Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40887614 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous