Comparison of Three Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Strategies after T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplantation: Tacrolimus versus Calcineurin Inhibitors + Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Sirolimus + Mycophenolate Mofetil

Abstract

Since the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (up to day +35), but promising results with sirolimus (with or without MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been published recently. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult haploSCT recipients who received conditioning with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF), PTCy, and additional GVHD prophylaxis with 1 of 3 strategies: cohort A, single-agent tacrolimus (n = 222); cohort B, CNI + MMF (n = 49); or cohort C, sirolimus + MMF (n = 101). No differences among the 3 cohorts were found in terms of grade II-IV acute GVHD (20% in cohort A, 25% in cohort B, and 30% in cohort C) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (9%, 6%, and 15%, respectively) at 100 days; however, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall chronic GVHD (24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively; P = .001) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; P = .001). There were no differences in 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse among the 3 cohorts. Overall, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI + MMF, and sirolimus + MMF GVHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following haploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with a low incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, although possible differences in chronic GVHD require further investigation.

Keywords: Haploidentical GVHD prophylaxis; Haploidentical stem cell transplantation; TBF conditioning; Tacrolimus versus sirolimus.