Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 9;25(1):87.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01085-1.

Exploration of clinical ethics consultation in Uganda: a case study of Uganda Cancer Institute

Affiliations

Exploration of clinical ethics consultation in Uganda: a case study of Uganda Cancer Institute

Mayi Mayega Nanyonga et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, healthcare providers (HCPs), hospital administrators, patients and their caretakers are increasingly confronted with complex moral, social, cultural, ethical, and legal dilemmas during clinical care. In high-income countries (HICs), formal and informal clinical ethics support services (CESSs) have been used to resolve bioethical conflicts among HCPs, patients, and their families. There is limited evidence about mechanisms used to resolve these issues as well as experiences and perspectives of the stakeholders that utilize them in most African countries including Uganda.

Methods: This phenomenological qualitative study utilized in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) to collect data from Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) staff, patients, and caretakers who were purposively selected. Data was analyzed deductively and inductively yielding themes and sub-themes that were used to develop a codebook.

Results: The study revealed there was no formal committee or mechanism dedicated to resolving ethical dilemmas at the UCI. Instead, ethical dilemmas were addressed in six forums: individual consultations, tumor board meetings, morbidity and mortality meetings (MMMs), core management meetings, rewards and sanctions committee meetings, and clinical departmental meetings. Participants expressed apprehension regarding the efficacy of these fora due to their non-ethics related agendas as well as members lacking training in medical ethics and the necessary experience to effectively resolve ethical dilemmas.

Conclusion: The fora employed at the UCI to address ethical dilemmas were implicit, involving decisions made through various structures without the guidance of personnel well-versed in medical or clinical ethics. There was a strong recommendation from participants to establish a multidisciplinary clinical ethics committee comprising members who are trained, skilled, and experienced in medical and clinical ethics.

Keywords: Clinical ethics consultation; Clinical ethics support services; Ethical dilemmas; Ethical issues; Uganda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Update of

References

    1. Grosek Š, Kučan R, Grošelj J, Oražem M, Grošelj U, Erčulj V, et al. The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):1–20.10.1371/journal.pone.0235509 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ullrich A, Theochari M, Bergelt C, Marx G, Woellert K, Bokemeyer C, et al. Ethical challenges in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer - A qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):1–13. 10.1186/s12904-020-00573-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giannetta N, Villa G, Pennestrì F, Sala R, Mordacci R, Manara DF. Ethical problems and moral distress in primary care: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghose S, Radhakrishnan V, Bhattacharya S. Ethics of cancer care: beyond biology and medicine. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019;13:1–12.10.3332/ecancer.2019.911 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rasoal D, Skovdahl K, Gifford M, Kihlgren A. Clinical Ethics support for Healthcare Personnel: an integrative literature review. HEC Forum. 2017;29(4):313–46. 10.1007/s10730-017-9325-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed