Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 26;16(15):2666.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16152666.

Omission of Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Breast Cancer Treated by Upfront Mastectomy and Sentinel Node Isolated Tumor Cells or Micrometastases

Affiliations

Omission of Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Breast Cancer Treated by Upfront Mastectomy and Sentinel Node Isolated Tumor Cells or Micrometastases

Gilles Houvenaeghel et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Omission of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in patients undergoing mastectomy with sentinel node (SN) isolated tumor cells (ITC) or micrometastases is debated due to potential under-treatment, with non-sentinel node (NSN) involvement detected in 7% to 18% of patients. This study evaluated the survival impact of cALND omission in a cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients treated by mastectomy with SN ITC or micrometastases. Among 554 early BC patients (391 pN1mi, 163 ITC), the NSN involvement rate was 13.2% (49/371). With a median follow-up of 66.46 months, multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between cALND omission and overall survival (OS, HR: 2.583, p = 0.043), disease-free survival (DFS, HR: 2.538, p = 0.008), and metastasis-free survival (MFS, HR: 2.756, p = 0.014). For Her2-positive or triple-negative patients, DFS was significantly affected by cALND omission (HR: 38.451, p = 0.030). In ER-positive Her2-negative BC, DFS, OS, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and MFS were significantly associated with cALND omission (DFS HR: 2.358, p = 0.043; OS HR: 3.317; RFS HR: 2.538; MFS HR: 2.756). For 161 patients aged ≤50 years with ER-positive/Her2-negative cancer, OS and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were notably impacted by cALND omission (OS HR: 103.47, p = 0.004; BCSS HR: 50.874, p = 0.035). These findings suggest a potential negative prognostic impact of cALND omission in patients with SN micrometastases or ITC. Further randomized trials are needed.

Keywords: axillary lymph node dissection; early breast cancer; micrometastases; sentinel lymph node.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disease-free survival for all patients according to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or not, in multivariate analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease-free survival (DFS) for Her2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer according to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or not, in multivariate analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Disease-free survival (DFS) for ER-positive Her2-negative breast cancer according to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or not, in multivariate analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Disease-free survival (DFS) for ER-positive Her2-negative breast cancer patients ≤ 50 years according to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or not, in multivariate analysis.

References

    1. Krag D.N., Anderson S.J., Julian T.B., Brown A.M., Harlow S.P., Ashikaga T., Weaver D.L., Miller B.J., Jalovec L.M., Frazier T.G., et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: Results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–888. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashikaga T., Krag D.N., Land S.R., Julian T.B., Anderson S.J., Brown A.M., Skelly J.M., Harlow S.P., Weaver D.L., Mamounas E.P., et al. Morbidity results from the NSABP B-32 trial comparing sentinel lymph node dissection versus axillary dissection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:111–118. doi: 10.1002/jso.21535. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Land S.R., Kopec J.A., Julian T.B., Brown A.M., Anderson S.J., Krag D.N., Christian N.J., Costantino J.P., Wolmark N., Ganz P.A. Patient-reported outcomes in sentinel node-negative adjuvant breast cancer patients receiving sentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project phase III protocol B-32. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:3929–3936. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2491. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giuliano A.E., Hunt K.K., Ballman K.V., Beitsch P.D., Whitworth P.W., Blumencranz P.W., Leitch A.M., Saha S., McCall L.M., Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569–575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleissig A., Fallowfield L.J., Langridge C.I., Johnson L., Newcombe R.G., Dixon M., Kissin M., Mansel R.E. Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2006;95:279–293. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9025-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources