Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 29;13(15):4452.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13154452.

Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Scleral Flap versus Scleral Pocket Technique for Sutureless Intrascleral One-Piece Lens Fixation

Affiliations

Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Scleral Flap versus Scleral Pocket Technique for Sutureless Intrascleral One-Piece Lens Fixation

Paola Marolo et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared long-term surgical outcomes of the scleral flap versus scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece intraocular lens (IOL) fixation. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at a single center, involving consecutive patients undergoing sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL implantation, between January 2020 and May 2022. Eyes were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: group 1 underwent scleral flap (n = 64), and group 2 received scleral pocket technique (n = 59). Visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and complications were assessed over a minimum 24-month follow-up period. Results: Both groups showed improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), increasing from 0.84 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.39 ± 0.23 logMAR (p = 0.042) at 24 months in group 1 and from 0.91 ± 0.63 logMAR at baseline to 0.45 ± 0.38 logMAR (p = 0.039) at 24 months in group 2. No significant differences in BCVA were observed between the groups at baseline (p = 0.991), 12 (p = 0.496) and 24 months (p = 0.557). Mean spherical equivalent (-0.73 ± 1.32 D in group 1 and -0.92 ± 0.99 D in group 2, p = 0.447), refractive prediction error (-0.21 ± 1.1 D in group 1 and -0.35 ± 1.8 D in group 2, p = 0.377), and surgically induced astigmatism (0.74 ± 0.89 D in group 1 and 0.85 ± 0.76 in group 2, p = 0.651) were comparable between the two groups. An IOL tilt of 5.5 ± 1.8 and 5.8 ± 2.0 degrees (p = 0.867) and an IOL decentration of 0.41 ± 0.21 mm and 0.29 ± 0.11 mm (p = 0.955) were obtained, respectively, in group 1 and group 2 at 24 months. Mean endothelial cell density remained stable at 24 months in both groups (p = 0.832 in group 1 and p = 0.443 in group 2), and it was 1747.20 ± 588.03 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1883.71 ± 621.29 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.327) at baseline, 1545.36 ± 442.3 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1417.44 ± 623.40 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.483) at 24 months. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed. Conclusions: The scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL fixation is comparable to the traditional scleral flap technique in terms of long-term visual outcomes and safety. The scleral pocket technique offers a simplified approach and a viable option even for less experienced surgeons.

Keywords: long-term outcomes; scleral flap; scleral pocket; secondary intraocular lens implantation; sutureless intrascleral one-piece lens; sutureless scleral fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the two surgical techniques: scleral flap (a) versus slceral pocket (b). The figures show the sutureless intrascleral one-piece lens in the background, indicating its placement in the posterior chamber with sutureless scleral fixation of the haptics. (a) illustrates the scleral flap technique: on the right, the scleral flap before closure on the IOL haptics, and on the left, the flap closed. (b) shows the scleral pocket technique: on the left, the scleral pocket still open with the IOL haptics inside, and on the right, the pocket closed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the two study groups throughout the follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency distribution of spherical equivalent (a), refractive prediction error (b), and surgically induced astigmatism (c) in the two study groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Boxplot of IOL tilt (a) and decentration (b) at 24 months in the two study groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean endothelial cell density in the two study groups throughout the follow-up.

References

    1. Por Y.M., Lavin M.J. Techniques of Intraocular Lens Suspension in the Absence of Capsular/Zonular Support. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2005;50:429–462. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F., Hayashi F. Intraocular Lens Tilt and Decentration, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Refractive Error after Trans-Scleral Suture Fixation Surgery. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:878–882. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00504-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Touriño Peralba R., Lamas-Francis D., Sarandeses-Diez T., Martínez-Pérez L., Rodríguez-Ares T. Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens for Aphakia: Can Location Influence the Final Outcomes? J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2018;44:818–826. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brockmann T., Gonnermann J., Brockmann C., Torun N., Joussen A.M., Bertelmann E. Morphologic Alterations on Posterior Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses after Traumatic Disenclavation. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1303–1307. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305364. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim K.H., Kim W.S. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Iris Fixation and Scleral Fixation as Treatment for Intraocular Lens Dislocation. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015;160:463–469.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources