Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 2;16(15):2528.
doi: 10.3390/nu16152528.

Identifying Future Study Designs and Indicators for Somatic Health Associated with Diets of Cohorts Living in Eco-Regions: Findings from the INSUM Expert Workshop

Affiliations

Identifying Future Study Designs and Indicators for Somatic Health Associated with Diets of Cohorts Living in Eco-Regions: Findings from the INSUM Expert Workshop

Dominika Średnicka-Tober et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Diets, but also overall food environments, comprise a variety of significant factors with direct and indirect impacts on human health. Eco-Regions are geographical areas with a territorial approach to rural development, utilizing organic food and farming practices, and principles and promoting sustainable communities and food systems. However, so far, little attention has been given to quantifying aspects of the health of citizens living in these sustainable transition territories. The project "Indicators for Assessment of Health Effects of Consumption of Sustainable, Organic School Meals in Eco-Regions" (INSUM) aims to identify and discuss research approaches and indicators that could be applied to effectively measure the somatic, mental, and social health dimensions of citizens in Eco-Regions, linked to the intake of organic foods in their diets. In this paper, we focus on the somatic (physical) health dimension. A two-day workshop was held to discuss suitable methodology with an interdisciplinary, international group of experts. The results showed the limitations of commonly used tools for measuring dietary intake (e.g., relying on the memory of participants), and nutritional biomarkers (e.g., variations in correlations with specific intakes) for research understanding dietary intake and the health effects of diets. To investigate the complexity of this issue, the most suitable approach seems to be the combination of traditional markers of physical and mental health alongside emerging indicators such as the microbiome, nutrigenomics, metabolomics, or inflammatory biomarkers. Using new, digital, non-invasive, and wearable technologies to monitor indicators could complement future research. We conclude that future studies should adopt systemic, multidisciplinary approaches by combining not only indicators of somatic and mental health and social wellbeing (MHSW) but also considering the potential benefits of organic diets for health as well as aspects of sustainability connected to food environments.

Keywords: Biodistrict; Eco-Regions; INSUM; biomarkers; indicators; somatic health; sustainable and healthy diet; sustainable food systems; workshop.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The understanding of health within the project “Indicators for Assessment of Health Effects of Consumption of Sustainable, Organic School Meals in Eco-Regions” (INSUM). Scheme developed based on the 1st INSUM workshop, May 2022. Source: Elsner et al. [9]; Antonovsky, 1987 [18]; Huber et al., 2011 [12]; Huber et al., 2016 [13]; Dahlgren and Whitehead, 1991 [14].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of the discussed indicators and tools to assess health. The inner square boundary shows indicators for the three dimensions: Mental Health and Social Wellbeing (orange), Sustainable and Healthy Diets (green), and Somatic Health (blue). The mixed-color boxes symbolize indicators that can be related to more than one category. The outer part displays tools for the assessment of those indicators. Not all indicators were discussed in relation to specific tools. This figure raises no claim for completeness. It serves rather as an overview of the discussed indicators and tools and reflects the main results of the first and second INSUM workshops [9].

References

    1. Nguyen H. Sustainable Food Systems: Concept and Framework. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2018.
    1. Payne C.L., Scarborough P., Cobiac L. Do Low-Carbon-Emission Diets Lead to Higher Nutritional Quality and Positive Health Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:2654–2661. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000495. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rockström J., Edenhofer O., Gaertner J., DeClerck F. Planet-Proofing the Global Food System. Nat. Food. 2020;1:3–5. doi: 10.1038/s43016-019-0010-4. - DOI
    1. Willett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., Garnett T., Tilman D., DeClerck F., Wood A., et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems. Lancet. 2019;393:447–492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FAO . The Experience of Biodistricts in Italy. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2017.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources