Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec;22(12):3479-3489.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.06.029. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pavlina Chrysafi  1 , Kevin Barnum  2 , Genevieve M Gerhard  3 , Thita Chiasakul  4 , Arshit Narang  5 , Megan Mcnichol  6 , Nicoletta Riva  7 , Georg Semmler  8 , Bernhard Scheiner  8 , Stefan Acosta  9 , Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou  10 , Mandy N Lauw  11 , Jonathan Berry  2 , Walter Ageno  12 , Jeffrey I Zwicker  13 , Rushad Patell  14
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pavlina Chrysafi et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Optimal anticoagulation management in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) experiencing splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) requires balancing risks of bleeding and recurrent thrombosis.

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of bleeding and thrombosis recurrence in patients with MPN-SpVT.

Methods: We included retrospective or prospective studies in English with ≥10 adult patients with MPN-SpVT. Outcomes included recurrent venous thrombosis (SpVT and non-SpVT), arterial thrombosis, and major bleeding. Pooled rates per 100 patient years with 95% CIs were calculated by DerSimonian-Laird method using random-effects model.

Results: Out of 4624 studies screened, 9 studies with a total of 443 patients were included in the meta-analysis with median follow-up of 3.5 years. In the 364 patients with MPN-SpVT treated with anticoagulation, pooled event rate for major bleeding was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5-5.1; I2 = 95%), for recurrent venous thrombosis was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.8-2.2; I2 = 72%), and for arterial thrombosis was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.6-3.3; I2 = 92%) per 100 patient years. Among 79 patients (n = 4 studies) who did not receive anticoagulation, pooled event rate for major bleeding was 3.2 (95% CI, 0.7-12.7; I2 = 97%), for recurrent venous thrombosis 3.5 (95% CI, 1.8-6.4; I2 = 88%), and for arterial thrombosis rate 1.6 (95% CI, 0.4-6.6; I2 = 95%) per 100 patient years.

Conclusion: Patients with MPN-SpVT treated with anticoagulation have significant risks for both major bleeding and thrombosis recurrence. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal anticoagulation approach in patients with MPN-SpVT.

Keywords: anticoagulants; bleeding; myeloproliferative disorders; thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interests P.C., K.B., G.M.G., T.C., A.N., M.M., N.R., G.S., S.A., M.L., and J.B. have no conflict of interest. B.S. received grant support from AstraZeneca and Eisai, speaker honoraria from Eisai, and travel support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, and Gilead, all not related to this study. P.E.R. has received research funding from Terrafirma; acted as a consultant for Hemostod, Mursla, Genfit, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Abbelight; received speaker fees from Tillots Pharma and AbbVie; and is supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM EQU202303016287), “Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale” (ATIP AVENIR), the “Agence Nationale pour la Recherche” (ANR-18-CE14-0006-01, RHU QUID-NASH, ANR-18-IDEX-0001, ANR-22-CE14-0002), the “Émergence, Ville de Paris,” the Fondation ARC, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement number 847949, and by France 2030 Recherche Hospitalo-Universitaire Liver-Track, all not related to this study. W.A. has received research support from Bayer and has participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS-Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Norgine, Sanofi, and Viatris, all not related to this study. J.I.Z. has received research funding from Incyte and Quercegen; consultancy services to Sanofi, CSL, and Parexel; and honoraria from/advisory board participation with Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), all outside current work. R.P. has received consultancy services from Merck Research Laboratory-Consultant, all outside the current work.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources