Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Aug 11;409(1):248.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03419-4.

Single large hepatocellular carcinoma > 5 cm with surgical indication: is it mandatory a major hepatectomy? a propensity-score weighted analysis

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Single large hepatocellular carcinoma > 5 cm with surgical indication: is it mandatory a major hepatectomy? a propensity-score weighted analysis

Mattia Garancini et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: Single large hepatocellular carcinoma >5cm (SLHCC) traditionally requires a major liver resection. Minor resections are often performed with the goal to reduce morbidity and mortality. Aim of the study was to establish if a major resection should be considered the best treatment for SLHCC or a more limited resection should be preferred.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of the HE.RC.O.LE.S. Group register was performed. All collected patients with surgically treated SLHCC were divided in 5 groups of treatment (major hepatectomy, sectorectomy, left lateral sectionectomy, segmentectomy, non-anatomical resection) and compared for baseline characteristics, short and long-term results. A propensity-score weighted analysis was performed.

Results: 535 patients were enrolled in the study. Major resection was associated with significantly increased major complications compared to left lateral sectionanectomy, segmentectomy and non-anatomical resection (all p<0.05) and borderline significant increased major complications compared to sectorectomy (p=0.08). Left lateral sectionectomy showed better overall survival compared to major resection (p=0.02), while other groups of treatment resulted similar to major hepatectomy group for the same item. Absence of oncological benefit after major resection and similar outcomes among the 5 groups of treatment was confirmed even in the sub-population excluding patients with macrovascular invasion.

Conclusion: Major resection was associated to increased major post-operative morbidity without long-term survival benefit; when technically feasible and oncologically adequate, minor resections should be preferred for the surgical treatment of SLHCC.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Large HCC; Major liver resection; Mortality; Overall survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Yang XD, Pan LH, Wang L, Ke Y, Cao J, Yang C, Zhong JH, Luo W, Guo J, Li LQ (2015) Systematic Review of Single Large and/or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Surgical Resection Improves Survival. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16:5541–5547. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.13.5541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevens CL, Awad A, Abbas SM, Watters DAK (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 19:653–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.03.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 379(9822):1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miyoshi A, Takahashi T, Otsuka T, Kohya N, Miyazaki K (2009) Efficacy of major hepatectomy for large hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 56(91-92):768–772 - PubMed
    1. Pandey D, Lee KH, Wai CT, Wagholikar G, Tan KC (2007) Long term outcome and prognostic factors for large hepatocellular carcinoma (10 cm or more) after surgical resection. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2817–2823. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9518-1 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources