Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study
- PMID: 39127984
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03630-1
Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib.
Methods: An observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction.
Results: Most patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy.
Trial registration: Not applicable.
Keywords: Dosing patterns; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Regorafenib.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interests: AMLM has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer. EGF has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer. ACM has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer, RAG has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer and Servier. CLL has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards and lecturing from Bayer, Merck, Roche, Amgen, Sanofi, MSD, Pierre Fabre and Servier, JJRZ has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer. CCL has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer, JAU has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer, Merck, Pierre Fabre and Servier, EAM has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer, Servier, Merck and Amgen, TMG has received honorarium for being part of advisory boards from Bayer. PMC, RJM, MSF have no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Medicines Research Ethics Committee of Galicia (“Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia”, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Register # 2021/264). Consent to participate: Written informed consent was obtained according to local regulations. Consent for publish: Not applicable.
References
-
- European Medicines Agency. Stivarga. Summary of product characteristics. 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/stivarga-epar... .
-
- Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, Humblet Y, Bouché O, Mineur L, Barone C, Adenis A, Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Lenz HJ, Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Cihon F, Cupit L, Wagner A, Laurent D. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (correct): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61900-x . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li J, Qin S, Xu R, Yau TC, Ma B, Pan H, Xu J, Bai Y, Chi Y, Wang L, Yeh KH, Bi F, Cheng Y, Le AT, Lin JK, Liu T, Ma D, Kappeler C, Kalmus J, Kim TW. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:619–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70156-7 . - DOI
-
- Grothey A, Cutsem EV, Sobrero AF, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, Humblet Y, Bouche O, Mineur L, Barone C, Adenis A, Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Lenz H-J, Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Cihon F, Wagner A, Laurent D, Cupit L. Time course of regorafenib-associated adverse events in the phase III CORRECT study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:467. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.467 . - DOI
-
- Ducreux M, Petersen LN, Öhler L, Bergamo F, Metges JP, De Groot JW, Wang JY, García Paredes B, Dochy E, Fiala-Buskies S, Cervantes A, O’Connor JM, Falcone A. Safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice in the prospective, observational correlate study. Eur J Cancer. 2019;123:146–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.015 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
