Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 9:11:23743735241272148.
doi: 10.1177/23743735241272148. eCollection 2024.

Communication in the ICU: An Unintended Nocebo Effect?

Irene Riestra Guiance  1 , Lindsey Wallace  2 , Katalin Varga  3 , Alexander Niven  1 , Megan Hosey  4 , Jillene Chitulangoma  5 , Kemuel Philbrick  6 , Ognjen Gajic  1 , Madeline Weiman  7 , Emily Schmitt  5 , David Pasko  8 , Lioudmila Karnatovskaia  1
Affiliations

Communication in the ICU: An Unintended Nocebo Effect?

Irene Riestra Guiance et al. J Patient Exp. .

Abstract

To identify medical phrases utilized by the critical care team that may have an unintended impact on the critically ill patient, we administered an anonymous survey to multi-professional critical care team members. We elicited examples of imprecise language that may have a negative emotional impact on the critically ill. Of the 1600 providers surveyed, 265 offered 1379 examples (912 unique) which were clustered into 5 categories. Medical jargon (eg, "riding the vent") was most prevalent (n = 549). There were 217 negative suggestions (eg, "you will feel a stick and a burn"). Hyperboles (eg, "black cloud") were common (n = 198) while homonyms (ie "he fibbed") accounted for 150 examples. Phrases such as "code brown in there" were categorized as metonyms (n = 144). 121 metaphors/similes (eg, "rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic") were provided. Phrases that have the potential to negatively impact critically ill patient perceptions are commonplace in critical care practice. Whether these everyday communication habits lead to an unintended nocebo effect on mental health outcomes of the critically ill deserves further study.

Keywords: ICU; PTSD; communication; nocebo effect; psychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Breakdown of responses by care team member group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Fagard J, Esseily R, Jacquey L, O’Regan K, Somogyi E. Fetal origin of sensorimotor behavior. Front Neurorobot. 2018;12:23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giacino JT. The minimally conscious state: defining the borders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:381‐95. - PubMed
    1. Perrin F, Schnakers C, Schabus M, et al. Brain response to one’s own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(4):562‐9. - PubMed
    1. Rämä P, Relander-Syrjänen K, Ohman J, et al. Semantic processing in comatose patients with intact temporal lobes as reflected by the N400 event-related potential. Neurosci Lett. 2010;474(2):88‐92. - PubMed
    1. Pape TL, Rosenow JM, Steiner M, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of familiar auditory sensory training for acute severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(6):537‐47. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources