Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 39131233
- PMCID: PMC11312847
- DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7768
Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Introduction: Families with multiple and complex problems often deal with multiple professionals and organizations for support. Integrated social care supposedly prevents the fragmentation of care that often occurs.We identified facilitators and barriers experienced by families receiving integrated social care and by the professionals who provide it.
Method: We performed a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, using the following databases: PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, CINAHL, PubMed, and Medline. Furthermore, conducted a thematic analysis. The results were divided into facilitators and barriers of integrated social care.
Results: We identified 278 studies and finally included sixteen in our scoping review. We identified facilitators, including: linking formal care with informal networks, promoting collaboration among professionals e.g., working in pairs, and professionals autonomy. We identified barriers, including: time constraints, tasks outside professionals' expertise, along with resistance to integrated collaboration among organizations. These findings can enhance the advancement of social integrated care as a promising approach to support families facing multiple and complex problems.
Conclusion: To empower families, integrated social care requires a systematic approach based on trust. It involves coordinated care, shared decision-making, informal networks and the participation of all family members, including children.
Keywords: families with multiple and complex problems; fragmentation of care; integrated care; integrated social care; interdisciplinary collaboration; multi-agency working; multi-problem families.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
References
-
- Nooteboom LA, Mulder EA, Kuiper CHZ, Colins OF, Vermeiren RRJM. Towards integrated youth care: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers for professionals. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2021; 48(1): 88–105. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01049-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sousa L, Ribeiro C, Rodrigues S. Are practitioners incorporating a strengths-focused approach when working with multi-problem poor families? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2007. Jan; 17(1): 53–66. DOI: 10.1002/casp.875 - DOI
-
- Knot-Dickscheit J, Knorth EJ. Gezinnen met meervoudige en complexe problemen: Theorie en praktijk. [Families with multiple and complex problems: theory and practice]. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Lemniscaat; 2019. [in Dutch].
-
- Verwey Jonker Instituut. Typologie voor een strategische aanpak van multiprobleemgezinnen in Rotterdam. [Typology for a strategic approach to multi-problem families in Rotterdam.]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Verwey Jonker Instituut; 2010. [in Dutch].
-
- Ghesquière P. Multi probleem gezinnen: problematische hulpverleningssituaties in perspective. [Multi-problem families: problematic assistance situations in perspective]. Louvain, Belgium: Garant; 1993. [in Dutch].
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources