Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Dec 22:2024.07.31.606077.
doi: 10.1101/2024.07.31.606077.

T cells promote distinct transcriptional programs of cutaneous inflammatory disease in keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts

Affiliations

T cells promote distinct transcriptional programs of cutaneous inflammatory disease in keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts

Hannah A DeBerg et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

T cells and structural cells coordinate appropriate inflammatory responses and restoration of barrier integrity following insult. Dysfunctional T cells precipitate skin pathology occurring alongside altered structural cell frequencies and transcriptional states, but to what extent different T cells promote disease-associated changes remains unclear. We show that functionally diverse circulating and skin-resident CD4+CLA+ T cell populations promote distinct transcriptional outcomes in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts associated with inflamed or healthy tissue. We identify Th17 cell-induced genes in keratinocytes that are enriched in psoriasis patient skin and normalized by anti-IL-17 therapy. We also describe a CD103+ skin-resident T cell-induced transcriptional module enriched in healthy controls that is diminished during psoriasis and scleroderma and show that CD103+ T cell frequencies are altered during disease. Interrogating clinical data using immune-dependent transcriptional signatures defines the T cell subsets and genes distinguishing inflamed from healthy skin and allows investigation of heterogeneous patient responses to biologic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Isolation and functional characterization of circulating and skin-resident human CD4+CLA+ T cell populations.
(a) Experimental design and study schematic: Blood and skin CD4+CLA+ Th cell isolation, activation, and subsequent stimulation of keratinocytes (KC) and fibroblasts (Fib), analysis by bulk RNA-seq, and comparison to public gene expression data from human skin. (b) CD4+CLA+ Th cell sorting strategy for indicated blood and skin populations. T Conv, conventional T cells; T Reg, regulatory T cells. (c) Quantitative cytokine bead array measurement of stimulated T cell supernatants for the 8 indicated analytes (n=5–6 donors per population). Full statistical analysis of cytokine production is provided in Table S1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. CD4+CLA+ T cells induce distinct transcriptional states in epithelial keratinocytes.
(a) Principal component (PC) analysis of healthy donor, primary human KCs cultured for 24 hours with the indicated activated blood- or skin-derived T cell supernatants, compared with matched unstimulated controls. (b) PC analysis showing each blood (n=7) and skin (n=5) healthy donor-treated KC sample. (c,d) Top: Heat map showing z-score expression changes of KC genes (rows) occurring in response to culture with the indicated donor T cell population supernatant (columns). Bottom: Heat map showing cytokine production for each donor T cell population, based on quantification in Figure 1. All measures are scaled by quantile. IL-5, IL-17a, and IL-17f are truncated at the 95% quantile due to extreme outliers (c) The top 20 differentially expressed KC genes are shown in response to each indicated donor T cell population. (d) Expression of 18 well-characterized inflammatory and proliferative response elements in KC averaged across all donor samples for each T cell subset. (e) Dot plot showing functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed, T cell-induced KC genes within the indicated modules (n=5–6 donors per population). The -log10 adjusted P value is plotted as a statistical measure for enrichment within each module.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. CD4+CLA+ T cells induce distinct transcriptional states in dermal fibroblasts.
(a) Principal component (PC) analysis of healthy donor, primary human KCs cultured for 24 hours with the indicated activated blood- or skin-derived T cell supernatants, compared with matched unstimulated controls. (b) PC analysis showing each blood (n=7) and skin (n=5) healthy donor-treated Fib sample. (c,d) Top: Heat map showing z-score expression changes of Fib genes (rows) occurring in response to culture with the indicated donor T cell population supernatant (columns). Bottom: Heat map showing cytokine production for each donor T cell population, based on quantification in Figure 1. All measures are scaled by quantile. IL-5, IL-17a, and IL-17f are truncated at the 95% quantile due to extreme outliers. (c) The top 20 differentially expressed Fib genes are shown in response to each donor T cell population. (d) Expression of 18 well-characterized inflammatory and proliferative response elements in Fibs averaged across all donor samples for each T cell subset. (e) Dot plot showing functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed, T cell-induced Fib genes within the indicated modules (n=5–6 donors per population). The -log10 adjusted P value is plotted as a statistical measure for enrichment within each module.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. T cell-dependent gene signatures are enriched in the epidermis during psoriasis and normalized by anti-IL-17A.
(a) PC analysis of gene expression for paired donor Ps lesional or non-lesional skin compared with healthy controls (HC) from the indicated public data sets. Subjects were treated with an anti-IL-17A therapy – secukinumab (Sec), ixekizumab (Ixe) – or placebo. Merged data sets were batch corrected to adjust for study-specific effects. (b) Heat map showing z-score expression changes of KC genes determined to be T cell-dependent (Figure 2) within public data, as shown in ‘a’ for the indicated groups. (c) Plots showing blood T cell-induced gene set scores, an averaged measure for the effect of each T cell subset on healthy donor KCs per subject group. (d) Radar plot showing T cell-induced KC signature gene enrichment values for the indicated pairwise comparisons from public data with -log10 p-values plotted along the radial axis. (e) Bivariate plot of the log2 fold change between subject groups for T cell-dependent KC genes (Ps vs HC, ‘Disease associated’; Ps vs anti-IL17A, ‘Drug responsive’). Individual genes are colored according to their T cell signature membership. (f) Plots showing batch corrected gene expression for each subject group for genes that have at least one expression-modulating Ps-associated SNP (i.e. eQTL). All statistical measures shown are compared to the Ps Lesional D0 group. Error bars indicate mean ± SD; ns = not significant, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. T cell-dependent gene signatures are enriched in the epidermis during atopic dermatitis and normalized by anti-IL-4Rα therapy.
(a) PC analysis of gene expression for AD paired donor lesional and non-lesional skin compared with healthy controls (HC) from the indicated publicly available data sets. AD patients were treated with dupilumab (Dupi), an anti-IL-4Rα drug. Merged data sets were batch corrected to adjust for study-specific effects. (b) Heat map showing z-score expression changes of KC genes determined to be T cell-dependent (Figure 2) within public data, as shown in ‘a’ for the indicated groups. (c) Plots showing blood T cell-induced gene set scores, an averaged measure for the effect of each T cell subset on healthy donor KCs per subject group. (d) Radar plot showing T cell-induced KC signature gene enrichment values across the indicated pairwise comparisons from public clinical trial data (AD and HC) with -log10 p-values plotted along the radial axis. (e) Bivariate plot of the log2 fold change for T cell-dependent KC genes within public clinical trial data from AD or HC subjects (AD vs HC, ‘Disease associated’; AD vs anti-IL17A, ‘Drug responsive’). Individual genes are colored according to their T cell signature membership. Error bars indicate mean ± SD; ns = not significant, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Skin T cell-induced gene signatures and CD4+CLA+ CD103+ T cells are elevated in healthy subjects and reduced during inflammatory skin disease.
(a-j) T cell-induced Fib gene sets (Figure 3) were used to analyze (a-d) public scleroderma and (e-j) psoriasis skin scRNA-seq data, filtered on cells annotated as ‘fibroblasts’. Ps lesional and non-lesional skin is from paired donors. (a-d) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) dimensionality reduction plots showing assignment by (a) subject group and (b) defined Fib subset [GSE195452]. (c) Heat map showing the enrichment of T cell-dependent gene signatures for each Fib population pooled across all subject groups. (d) Plot showing T cell-dependent gene signature enrichment in Fib subsets, pseudobulked at the subject level. (e-g) UMAP plots showing assignment (e) by subject group and (f) skin T cell-dependent gene set enrichment, (g) quantified per group [GSE173706]. (h-j) UMAP plots of patient data [GSE228421] before (Day 0) and after (Days 3, 14) IL-23 blockade (Risankizumab, Rk) showing assignment (h) by subject group and (i) T cell-dependent gene set enrichment, (j) quantified per group. (k-m) Cytometric analysis of blood CD4+CLA+ CD103+ T cells. (k) Representative fluorescence cytometry plots and (l) quantification of T cells in HC (n=15) or SSc (n=19) patient blood, gated on CD103, integrin β7, and pre-gated on CLAmem, as in Figure 1. SSc samples: circle = limited disease, square = diffuse, X = unclassified. (m) Representative mass cytometry plots and (n) quantification of T cells in HC (n=11) or Ps (n=12) patient blood, gated on CLAmem, as in Figure S8. Error bars indicate mean ± SD; ns = not significant, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001 (d, Student’s t-test; l,n, Mann-Whitney U).

References

    1. Cheng J.B., Sedgewick A.J., Finnegan A.I., Harirchian P., Lee J., Kwon S., Fassett M.S., Golovato J., Gray M., Ghadially R., et al. (2018). Transcriptional Programming of Normal and Inflamed Human Epidermis at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep 25, 871–883. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buechler M.B., Pradhan R.N., Krishnamurty A.T., Cox C., Calviello A.K., Wang A.W., Yang Y.A., Tam L., Caothien R., Roose-Girma M., et al. (2021). Cross-tissue organization of the fibroblast lineage. Nature 593, 575–579. 10.1038/s41586-021-03549-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gur C., Wang S.-Y., Sheban F., Zada M., Li B., Kharouf F., Peleg H., Aamar S., Yalin A., Kirschenbaum D., et al. (2022). LGR5 expressing skin fibroblasts define a major cellular hub perturbed in scleroderma. Cell 185, 1373–1388.e20. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabib T., Morse C., Wang T., Chen W., and Lafyatis R. (2018). SFRP2/DPP4 and FMO1/LSP1 Define Major Fibroblast Populations in Human Skin. J Invest Dermatol 138, 802–810. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabib T., Huang M., Morse N., Papazoglou A., Behera R., Jia M., Bulik M., Monier D.E., Benos P.V., Chen W., et al. (2021). Myofibroblast transcriptome indicates SFRP2hi fibroblast progenitors in systemic sclerosis skin. Nat Commun 12, 4384. 10.1038/s41467-021-24607-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types