Treatment Strategies for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Complexity and Risk

Affiliations

Editorial

Brittany M Owen et al. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022.

. 2022 Sep 30;1(5):100435.

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100435. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.

¹ University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Memorial Hermann Heart & Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas.

No abstract available

Keywords: CHIP; bifurcation; coronary artery disease.

Comment on

1. Mohamed M.O., Polad J., Hildick-Smith D., et al. Impact of coronary lesion complexity in percutaneous coronary intervention: one-year outcomes from the large, multicentre e-Ultimaster registry. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(7):603–612. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00361. - DOI - PubMed
1. Fujisaki T., Kuno T., Numasawa Y., et al. Provisional or 2-stent technique for bifurcation lesions in the second-generation drug-eluting stent era. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022;1(5):100410.
1. Di Gioia G., Sonck J., Ferenc M., et al. Clinical outcomes following coronary bifurcation PCI techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis comprising 5,711 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(12):1432–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.054. - DOI - PubMed
1. Raphael C.E., O’Kane P.D., Johnson T.W., et al. Evolution of the crush technique for bifurcation stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(21):2315–2326. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.048. - DOI - PubMed
1. Elbadawi A., Shnoda M., Dang A., et al. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes with bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention techniques. Am J Cardiol. 2022;165:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.10.048. - DOI - PubMed