Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Hybrid Transtibial Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Large Single-Center Case Series With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
- PMID: 39131489
- PMCID: PMC11310593
- DOI: 10.1177/23259671241242778
Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Hybrid Transtibial Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Large Single-Center Case Series With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
Abstract
Background: A novel hybrid transtibial (HTT) approach to femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been developed that circumvents the need for knee hyperflexion and orients the graft in the most anatomic position without sacrificing the tunnel length or aperture.
Hypothesis: Patients who underwent ACLR utilizing the HTT technique would achieve excellent patient-reported outcome scores and experience low rates of graft failure and reoperations.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR at a single institution between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with the HTT, anteromedial portal (AMP), and transtibial (TT) approaches were matched based on age, sex, and body mass index ±3 kg/m2. Demographic and surgical data as well as femoral tunnel angle measurements on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were collected for the 3 groups. However, clinical outcomes were only reported for the HTT group because of concerns of graft heterogeneity.
Results: A total of 170 patients (median age, 26.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 18.0-35.0 years]) who underwent ACLR using the HTT approach were included. The median coronal- and sagittal-plane femoral tunnel angles were 47° (IQR, 42°-53°) and 40° (IQR, 34°-46°), respectively. The sagittal-plane femoral tunnel angles in the HTT group were significantly more horizontal compared with those in the TT group (P < .0001), whereas the coronal-plane femoral tunnel angles in the HTT group were found to be significantly more vertical compared with those in the AMP group (P = .001) and more horizontal compared with those in the TT group (P < .0001). The graft failure and reoperation rates in the HTT group at a minimum 2-year follow-up were 1.8% (3/170) and 4.7% (8/170), respectively. The complication rate was 6.5% (11/170), with the most common complication being subjective stiffness in 7 patients. The median Lysholm score was 89.5 (IQR, 79.0-98.0); the median International Knee Documentation Committee score was 83.9 (IQR, 65.5-90.8); and the median Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were 55.0 (IQR, 52.6-55.9) and 56.2 (IQR, 49.1-59.3), respectively.
Conclusion: ACLR using the HTT technique was associated with low graft retear and revision surgery rates and good patient-reported outcome scores at medium-term follow-up and demonstrated femoral tunnel obliquity on postoperative radiographs that correlated with optimal parameters previously reported in cadaveric and biomechanical studies.
Keywords: ACLR; HTT; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; clinical outcomes; hybrid transtibial; medium-term.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: D.P.T. has received research support from Arthrex and education payments from Arthrex and Smith + Nephew. D.P.P. has received education payments from Peerless Surgical and consulting fees from Zimmer Biomet. B.M.S. has received research support from Arthrex, education payments from Arthrex and Smith + Nephew, consulting fees from Bioventus, and publishing royalties from Nova Science Publishers. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A Hybrid Transtibial Technique Combines the Advantages of Anteromedial Portal and Transtibial Approaches: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;48(13):3200-3207. doi: 10.1177/0363546520956645. Epub 2020 Oct 5. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 33017169 Clinical Trial.
-
Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 18;9(11):23259671211054509. doi: 10.1177/23259671211054509. eCollection 2021 Nov. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34820462 Free PMC article.
-
Knee moment and shear force are correlated with femoral tunnel orientation after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2377-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541232. Epub 2014 Jul 25. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 25062662
-
Anteromedial Portal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Yields Similar Outcomes to Non-AMP Femoral Drilling Double-Bundle Techniques: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec 11;7(12):2325967119888140. doi: 10.1177/2325967119888140. eCollection 2019 Dec. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31853457 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Higher Incidence of Radiographic Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis With Transtibial Femoral Tunnel Positioning Compared With Anteromedial Femoral Tunnel Positioning During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;50(1):255-263. doi: 10.1177/0363546521993818. Epub 2021 Mar 26. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 33769902
References
-
- Abram SGF, Price AJ, Judge A, Beard DJ. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and meniscal repair rates have both increased in the past 20 years in England: hospital statistics from 1997 to 2017. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(5):286-291. - PubMed
-
- Antosh IJ, Patzkowski JC, Racusin AW, Aden JK, Waterman SM. Return to military duty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Mil Med. 2018;183(1-2):e83-e89. - PubMed
-
- Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, et al.. Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):366-373. - PubMed
-
- Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(3):342-350. - PubMed
-
- Bhatia S, Korth K, Van Thiel GS, et al.. Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(1):51-57. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources