Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 30;1(4):100338.
doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100338. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.

Sex-Specific Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A NOBLE Substudy

Affiliations

Sex-Specific Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A NOBLE Substudy

Margaret B McEntegart et al. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. .

Abstract

Background: While female sex has been associated with worse outcomes following coronary revascularization, previous analyses in left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease have been conflicting. In addition, a signal that increased mortality may be specific to women treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires further investigation.

Methods: Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization study (NOBLE) was a randomized trial comparing PCI to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with LMCA disease. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonprocedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]). We report the 5-year sex-specific outcomes.

Results: Of 1184 patients analyzed, 256 (22%) were female and 928 (78%) were male. There were no significant within-sex differences in baseline characteristics, disease location, or complexity between those treated with PCI and those with CABG. The 5-year MACCE rates were 29% and 15% in females and 28% and 20% in males treated with PCI and CABG, respectively. Within both sexes, there was an increased risk of MACCE with PCI compared with CABG, but no difference in all-cause mortality. On multivariate analysis, female sex was not an independent predictor of MACCE.

Conclusions: Following the treatment of LMCA disease, long-term outcomes favored CABG over PCI in both sexes. Importantly, there was no difference in all-cause mortality in females or males at 5 ​years.

Keywords: Female; coronary artery bypass surgery; left main coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr McEntegart has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Holm has received institutional research grants from 10.13039/501100008877Biosensors, 10.13039/100001316Abbott, 10.13039/100015305Reva Medical, Medis Medical Imaging, and 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific and speaker fees from Terumo, Abbott, Reva Medical, and Medis Medical Imaging. Dr Oldroyd has received speaker fees from Biosensors and Abbott Vascular. Dr Erglis has received institutional research grants from 10.13039/100011949Abbott Vascular and 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific and consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Cordis J&J, and Medtronic. Dr Christiansen has received grants from 10.13039/501100008877Biosensors. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curves, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and death.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Five-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and mortality according to sex and revascularization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves, individual components of MACCE.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots, PCI vs CABG.

References

    1. Stone G.W., Sabik J.F., Serruys P.W., et al. Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2223–2235. - PubMed
    1. Mäkikallio T., Holm N.R., Lindsay M., et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2743–2752. - PubMed
    1. Palmerini T., Serruys P., Kappetein A.P., et al. Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients. Am Heart J. 2017;190:54–63. - PubMed
    1. Bertaina M., De Filippo O., Iannaccone M., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft in left main coronary artery disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials. J Cardiovasc Med. 2018;19:554–563. - PubMed
    1. Sabatine M.S., Bergmark B.A., Murphy S.A., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;398:2247–2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources