Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Nov-Dec;44(6):254-8.

[Antibodies against ds-DNA and nucleoprotein in systemic lupus erythematosus--comparison of various determinative methods]

[Article in German]
  • PMID: 3913215
Comparative Study

[Antibodies against ds-DNA and nucleoprotein in systemic lupus erythematosus--comparison of various determinative methods]

[Article in German]
K Geissler et al. Z Rheumatol. 1985 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Five methods for the detection of antibodies against ds-DNA and nucleoprotein were compared with respect to their usefulness for the diagnosis and monitoring of SLE: filter radio-immunoassay (filter RIA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA N) and Crithidia lucilia assay (CL-IF) for detecting anti-ds-DNA antibodies as well as enzyme-immunoassay (EIA NP) and a latex test (LE test NP) for detecting anti-NP antibodies. In testing 32 SLE patients we obtained the following sensitivities: filter RIA 78%, EIA N 87%, CL-IF 47%, EIA NP 73% and LE test NP 25%. Among 95 patients having ANA greater than or equal to 1:100 in their sera, but who had no clinical signs of SLE, anti-ds-DNA antibodies were detectable in 12% (filter RIA), 16% (EIA N) and 4% (CL-IF) as well as anti-NP antibodies in 35% (EIA NP) and 4% (LE test NP). Only filter RIA and EIA N were of significant value in differentiating active from inactive SLE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources