Coronary Stenting in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Small Coronary Arteries Followed by One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: Onyx ONE Clear
- PMID: 39132364
- PMCID: PMC11308796
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100432
Coronary Stenting in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Small Coronary Arteries Followed by One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: Onyx ONE Clear
Abstract
Background: Small reference vessel diameters (RVDs) are a predictor of ischemic events after coronary stenting. Among patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) precluding long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), those with small vessel disease (SVD) constitute an especially high-risk subgroup. Here, we evaluated the results of a durable-polymer, coronary zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) for the treatment of patients with SVD at HBR with 1-month DAPT.
Methods: In the prospective, multicenter Onyx ONE (One-Month DAPT) Clear study, 1506 patients at HBR treated with a ZES that discontinued DAPT at 30 days were included. The clinical outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of lesions with an RVD of ≤2.5 mm (SVD group, as determined by the angiographic core laboratory) were compared with patients without SVD. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction between 1 and 12 months.
Results: Small vessel diameter treatment was performed in 489 (32.5%) patients. Patients with SVD were more likely to be women, have undergone a previous percutaneous intervention, and have multivessel coronary artery disease than patients without SVD. There were no significant differences in lesion, device, or procedural success between the groups. The Kaplan-Meier rate estimate of the primary end point was 8.5% and 6.8% in patients with SVD and those without SVD, respectively (P = .425). No significant differences were found in any secondary end point. The Kaplan-Meier rate of stent thrombosis was 0.6% and 0.8% in patients with SVD and those without SVD, respectively (P = .50).
Conclusions: Among patients at HBR treated with a ZES and 1-month DAPT, those with SVD had favorable 12-month ischemic and bleeding outcomes, which were comparable with those of patients with larger caliber vessels.
Keywords: bleeding risk; coronary stenting; percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2022 Medtronic.
Figures




References
-
- Moreno R., Fernández C., Alfonso F., et al. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels: a meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):1964–1972. - PubMed
-
- Redfors B., Chen S., Généreux P., et al. Relationship between stent diameter, platelet reactivity, and thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary artery revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124(9):1363–1371. - PubMed
-
- Moreno R., Legrand V., Ferrario M., et al. Clinical outcomes in unselected patients treated with the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium, everolimus-eluting stent: final five-year results from the PE PROVE Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(3):398–403. - PubMed
-
- Windecker S., Latib A., Kedhi E., et al. Polymer-based or polymer-free stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1208–1218. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources