Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 17:93:245-258.
doi: 10.5114/jhk/190572. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS-PL)

Affiliations

Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS-PL)

Zuzanna Wałach-Biśta et al. J Hum Kinet. .

Abstract

The study investigated psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS-PL). Following an expert review (stage 1), a sample of 333 athletes voluntarily participated in the study to verify the internal structure of the questionnaire (stage 2). In a final step (stage 3), confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis of the MIS-PL subscales with other variables were conducted to demonstrate the stability and reproducibility of the factor structure of the scale and to determine the theoretical validity of the measure. The factor analyses performed confirmed the three-factor structure of the MIS-PL with the following dimensions: 1) awareness, 2) non-judgmental attitude, and 3) refocusing, characterized by acceptable fit indices. Analyses of the correlations between the MIS-PL subscales and conceptually related variables (mindfulness in daily life, worry, concentration disruption, mental toughness, and flow) also proved statistically significant. In summary, the MIS-PL is a valid measure for assessing mindfulness in sport.

Keywords: awareness; questionnaire; reliability; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bayköse, N., & Çelik, B. (2021). The Psychometric Properties of Mindfulness Inventory in Sport and Examination of Its Measurement Invariance. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(SPE3), e1168. doi:10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1168 - DOI
    1. Ben Salha, M., Kern, L., Abdelatif, F., Nabli, E. H., Baria, A., & Fournier, J. F. (2022). Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 129(6), 1838–1852. doi:10.1177/00315125221127513 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 - DOI
    1. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Schölly, E. L. (2022). Exploring the past, present, and future of the mindfulness field: A multitechnique bibliometric review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 792599. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources