The Nurse-Implemented Chronotherapeutic Bundle in Critically Ill Children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ): Pilot Testing in a Two-Phase Cohort Study, 2017-2021
- PMID: 39133067
- PMCID: PMC11534519
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003595
The Nurse-Implemented Chronotherapeutic Bundle in Critically Ill Children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ): Pilot Testing in a Two-Phase Cohort Study, 2017-2021
Abstract
Objectives: Pilot test the nurse-led chronotherapeutic bundle in critically ill children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ).
Design: A two-phase cohort study was carried out from 2017 to 2021.
Setting: Two similarly sized and organized PICUs in the United States.
Patients: Children 6 months to 17 years old who were mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure.
Interventions: R 2 seven-item chronotherapeutic bundle, including: 1) replication of child's pre-hospital daily routine (i.e., sleep/wake, feeding, activity patterns); 2) cycled day-night light/sound modulation; 3) minimal effective sedation; 4) night fasting with bolus enteral daytime feedings; 5) early progressive mobility; 6) nursing care continuity; and 7) parent diaries.
Measurements and main results: Children underwent environmental (light, sound) and patient (actigraphy, activity log, salivary melatonin, electroencephalogram) monitoring. Parents completed the Child's Daily Routine and Sleep Survey (CDRSS) and Family-Centered Care Scale. The primary outcome was post-extubation daytime activity consolidation (Daytime Activity Ratio Estimate [DARE]). Twenty baseline-phase (2017-2019) and 36 intervention-phase (2019-2021) participants were enrolled. During the intervention phase, nurses used the CDRSS to construct children's PICU schedules. Overall compliance with nurse-implemented R 2 elements 1-5 increased from 18% (interquartile range, 13-30%) at baseline to 63% (53-68%) during the intervention phase ( p < 0.001). Intervention participants were exposed to their pre-hospitalization daily routine ( p = 0.002), cycled day-night light/sound modulation ( p < 0.001), and early progressive mobility on more PICU days ( p = 0.02). Sedation target identification, enteral feeding schedules, and nursing care continuity did not differ between phases. Parent diaries were seldom used. DARE improved during the intervention phase and was higher pre-extubation (median 62% vs. 53%; p = 0.04) but not post-extubation (62% vs. 57%; p = 0.56).
Conclusions: In the PICU, implementation of an individualized nurse-implemented chronotherapeutic bundle is feasible. Children who received the R 2 bundle had increased pre-extubation daytime activity consolidation compared to children receiving usual care. Given variation in protocol adherence, further R 2 testing should include interprofessional collaboration, pragmatic trial design, and implementation science strategies.
Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Curley’s, Zuppa’s, and Kudchadkar’s institutions received funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Drs. Curley’s and Kalvas’s institutions received funding from the National Institute of Nursing Research. Dr. Kalvas’s institution received funding from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Drs. Curley, Kalvas, Perry-Eaddy, Wypij, Zuppa, and Kudchadkar received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Yuan received funding from Masimo; his institution received funding from Masimo. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Study protocol for a two-center test of a nurse-implemented chronotherapeutic restoring bundle in critically ill children: RESTORE Resilience (R2).Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Aug 19;23:100840. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100840. eCollection 2021 Sep. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021. PMID: 34466711 Free PMC article.
-
Protocolized sedation vs usual care in pediatric patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):379-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.18399. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 25602358 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Fluid Management Bundle in Critically Ill Children With Respiratory Failure Is Associated With a Reduced Prevalence of Excess Fluid Accumulation.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr 1;26(4):e454-e462. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003693. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025. PMID: 39836185
-
Care bundles to reduce unplanned extubation in critically ill children: a systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis.Arch Dis Child. 2022 Mar;107(3):271-276. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321996. Epub 2021 Jul 20. Arch Dis Child. 2022. PMID: 34284999
-
Effectiveness of a Ventilator Care Bundle to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia at the PICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 May;20(5):474-480. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001862. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31058785
References
-
- Felten M, Dame C, Lachmann G, et al.: Circadian rhythm disruption in critically ill patients. Acta Physiologica 2023; 238:e13962. - PubMed
-
- Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al.: Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:e825–e873 - PubMed
-
- Smith HAB, Besunder JB, Betters KA, et al.: 2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice guidelines on prevention and management of pain, agitation, neuromuscular blockade, and delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the ICU environment and early mobility. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23:e74–e110 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources