Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1864-1872.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae432.

A secukinumab dose-escalation study in patients with ankylosing spondylitis not achieving inactive disease after 16 weeks of treatment

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A secukinumab dose-escalation study in patients with ankylosing spondylitis not achieving inactive disease after 16 weeks of treatment

Atul Deodhar et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical response at week 52 in patients with AS who received secukinumab 300 vs 150 mg after inadequate response to 150 mg at week 16.

Methods: ASLeap (NCT03350815) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 4 trial. After 16 weeks of open-label secukinumab 150 mg (Treatment Period 1), patients who did not achieve inactive disease [AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3] at both week 12 and 16 were considered to have an inadequate response and were randomized 1:1 to receive secukinumab 300 or 150 mg every 4 weeks until week 52 (Treatment Period 2). The primary efficacy variable was achievement of ASDAS <1.3 at week 52 using week 16 as baseline. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 52.

Results: Of 322 patients treated with secukinumab in Treatment Period 1, 207 (64.3%) had inadequate response. Similar proportions of patients with inadequate response randomized to secukinumab 300 mg (n = 101) and 150 mg (n = 105) in Treatment Period 2 completed the study (83.8% and 84.3%, respectively). At week 52, 8.8% and 6.7% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 and 150 mg, respectively, achieved ASDAS <1.3. The incidence of TEAEs was similar in both groups through week 52. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion: Patients with AS who did not achieve ASDAS <1.3 after receiving secukinumab 150 mg for 16 weeks experienced similar clinical response and safety through week 52 regardless of dose escalation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03350815.

Keywords: AS; dose escalation; secukinumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Design of the ASLeap study. aSecukinumab administered as a single injection for secukinumab 150 mg and administered as 2 injections of the 150-mg dose for secukinumab 300 mg. bPlacebo administered SC 1 mL as per double-dummy design to maintain blinding at week 16 randomization. cTo support the integrity of the blind for the randomized inadequate response group, the patients with adequate response were also dose blinded between week 16 and 48 and received a single matching placebo injection with their secukinumab 150-mg injection. dNo change or an increase (worsening) from baseline in total ASDAS at either week 12 or 16. ASDAS: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BL: baseline; Q4W: every 4 weeks; R: randomization; SC: subcutaneous
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Achievement of binary outcomes in Treatment Period 2 among inadequate responders in Treatment Period 1 (Full Analysis Set; non-responder imputation). ASAS: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society; ASDAS: AS Disease Activity Score
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Achievement of ASAS20, ASAS40, BASDAI50, ASDAS improvement of ≥1.1 and ASDAS inactive disease up to week 52. Proportions of patients achieving binary outcomes up to week 52 using week 0 as baseline (Full Analysis Set; non-responder imputation). aThese data correspond to the full analysis set of patients randomized in Treatment Period 2; the achievement of ASDAS inactive disease (<1.3) is absolute and not calculated based on baseline disease activity. ASAS: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society; ASDAS: AS Disease Activity Score

References

    1. Braun J, Sieper J.. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 2007;369:1379–90. - PubMed
    1. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D.. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet 2017;390:73–84. - PubMed
    1. Seo MR, Baek HL, Yoon HH. et al. Delayed diagnosis is linked to worse outcomes and unfavourable treatment responses in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2015;34:1397–405. - PubMed
    1. Deodhar A, Mease PJ, Reveille JD. et al. Frequency of axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis among patients seen by US rheumatologists for evaluation of chronic back pain. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1669–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal R, Malaviya AN.. Diagnosis delay in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: factors and outcomes—an Indian perspective. Clin Rheumatol 2009;28:327–31. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data