Patient experience in bariatric surgery: protocol of a French narrative inquiry and qualitative analysis
- PMID: 39134437
- PMCID: PMC11331975
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082528
Patient experience in bariatric surgery: protocol of a French narrative inquiry and qualitative analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The quality of hospital care, especially surgery, is traditionally assessed using indicators derived from healthcare databases or safety indicators. Given the growing importance of placing the patient at the heart of care evaluation, the use of questionnaires such as the Patient-Reported Experience Measures and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures has become widespread in recent years. However, these tools-addressing factors such as satisfaction, pain management or wait times-only imperfectly reflect the patient's experience, and all such attempts at patient-centred care quality assessment rely on questions or indicators defined in advance by healthcare providers and health authorities. A biopsychosocial model may allow to better understand the patient experience and to improve care pathways. This study seeks to construct a narrative of the bariatric surgical care journey with instruments from narrative inquiry, propose a metanarrative that can serve as a basis for more sophisticated and reliable patient-focused care quality models and define indicators linked to patients' feelings and stories.
Methods and analysis: To achieve these aims, 16 bariatric surgical patients at the hospital of Créteil, France (Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil), will be included and interviewed once before and twice after surgery, at months 3 and 6. Narratives collected will be used to construct a metanarrative intended to encompass all possible narratives. This metanarrative may ultimately inform new patient care quality indicators, furthering care focused on patients and tailored to their needs and predispositions.
Ethics and dissemination: The study is funded by the Group of Clinical Research and Innovation in Île-de-France and was approved by CPP SUD-EST VI Clermont-Ferrand (France) Research Ethics Committee. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The patient associations will be approached for the dissemination of the study results.
Trial registration number: NCT05092659.
Keywords: bariatric surgery; patient-centred care; quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- World Health Organization Obesity. 2020. https://www.who.int/health-topics/obesity Available.
-
- Haute Autorité de Santé Obésité: prise en charge chirurgicale chez l’adulte [Obesity: surgical treatment for adults] 2009. https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_765529/fr/obesite-prise-en-charge-chirur... Available.
-
- Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obeg Surg. 2023;33:3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Marshall S, Mackay H, Matthews C, et al. Does intensive multidisciplinary intervention for adults who elect bariatric surgery improve post-operative weight loss, co-morbidities, and quality of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020;21:e13012. doi: 10.1111/obr.13012. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials